Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1517

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:56, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1517_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Adipocyte_basal_bone_Osteoblast_pleomorphic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:99357430..99357445,+p1@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99463740..99463765,+p5@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99509555..99509574,+p3@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99509604..99509650,+p2@COL8A1
Hg19::chr3:99514880..99514892,+p@chr3:99514880..99514892
+
Hg19::chr3:99514927..99514940,+p@chr3:99514927..99514940
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast5.50e-2076
mesodermal cell1.73e-11121
somatic cell3.69e-11588
animal cell4.76e-09679
eukaryotic cell4.76e-09679
preadipocyte7.38e-0912
muscle precursor cell1.82e-0858
myoblast1.82e-0858
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell1.82e-0858
multi fate stem cell1.83e-08427
somatic stem cell2.21e-08433
skin fibroblast9.16e-0823
contractile cell1.41e-0759
stem cell1.66e-07441
smooth muscle cell2.61e-0743
smooth muscle myoblast2.61e-0743
non-terminally differentiated cell3.05e-07106
muscle cell4.13e-0755
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature1.76e-1178
vascular system1.76e-1178
cardiovascular system5.00e-09109
circulatory system9.99e-09112
unilaminar epithelium1.41e-08148
organism subdivision1.57e-08264
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.84e-0883
epithelial tube open at both ends4.73e-0859
blood vessel4.73e-0859
blood vasculature4.73e-0859
vascular cord4.73e-0859
epithelial tube4.75e-08117
vessel5.36e-0868
epithelial vesicle1.78e-0778
artery2.47e-0742
arterial blood vessel2.47e-0742
arterial system2.47e-0742
skeletal muscle tissue3.20e-0762
striated muscle tissue3.20e-0762
myotome3.20e-0762
muscle tissue4.09e-0764
musculature4.09e-0764
musculature of body4.09e-0764
dense mesenchyme tissue4.23e-0773
somite5.19e-0771
presomitic mesoderm5.19e-0771
presumptive segmental plate5.19e-0771
dermomyotome5.19e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.19e-0771
integument6.65e-0746
integumental system6.65e-0746
paraxial mesoderm9.25e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.25e-0772
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer2.10e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.