Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3604

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:13, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3604_Mesenchymal_Alveolar_Renal_Hair_Fibroblast_Hepatic_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:1389027..1389094,-p1@MYO1C
Hg19::chr17:1394912..1394935,-p4@MYO1C
Hg19::chr17:1394940..1394987,-p2@MYO1C


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision4.76e-24264
trunk8.11e-22199
mesenchyme6.27e-20160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.27e-20160
epithelial vesicle8.06e-1878
multilaminar epithelium3.07e-1783
trunk mesenchyme7.27e-17122
somite1.20e-1571
presomitic mesoderm1.20e-1571
presumptive segmental plate1.20e-1571
dermomyotome1.20e-1571
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.20e-1571
surface structure1.33e-1599
dense mesenchyme tissue3.48e-1573
epithelial tube6.98e-15117
paraxial mesoderm8.34e-1572
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.34e-1572
unilaminar epithelium9.43e-15148
muscle tissue1.89e-1364
musculature1.89e-1364
musculature of body1.89e-1364
skeletal muscle tissue3.21e-1362
striated muscle tissue3.21e-1362
myotome3.21e-1362
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.27e-1183
integument3.49e-1146
integumental system3.49e-1146
skin of body4.31e-1141
multi-tissue structure1.42e-10342
vasculature3.89e-1078
vascular system3.89e-1078
multi-cellular organism1.05e-09656
epithelial tube open at both ends1.25e-0959
blood vessel1.25e-0959
blood vasculature1.25e-0959
vascular cord1.25e-0959
subdivision of trunk1.61e-09112
vessel2.48e-0968
artery9.65e-0942
arterial blood vessel9.65e-0942
arterial system9.65e-0942
endoderm-derived structure1.58e-08160
endoderm1.58e-08160
presumptive endoderm1.58e-08160
cell layer2.25e-08309
epithelium3.10e-08306
anatomical system5.57e-08624
anatomical group7.48e-08625
organ component layer8.35e-0866
compound organ4.25e-0768
systemic artery4.57e-0733
systemic arterial system4.57e-0733
primordium5.43e-07160
circulatory system5.52e-07112


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324790255699024



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.