Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1412

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:52, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr18:52687395..52687418,-p@chr18:52687395..52687418
-
Mm9::chr1:62707387..62707388,+p1@ENSMUST00000118720
Mm9::chr5:99372805..99372824,-p5@Prkg2
Mm9::chr5:99372841..99372859,-p4@Prkg2
Mm9::chr5:99372896..99372910,-p7@Prkg2
Mm9::chr6:34703587..34703591,+p@chr6:34703587..34703591
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
skeletal muscle tissue2.35e-109
striated muscle tissue2.35e-109
muscle tissue2.35e-109
multilaminar epithelium2.35e-109
epithelial vesicle2.35e-109
musculature2.35e-109
somite2.35e-109
myotome2.35e-109
presomitic mesoderm2.35e-109
presumptive segmental plate2.35e-109
dermomyotome2.35e-109
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.35e-109
musculature of body3.06e-0910
smooth muscle tissue4.81e-093
blood vessel smooth muscle4.81e-093
arterial system smooth muscle4.81e-093
artery smooth muscle tissue4.81e-093
aorta smooth muscle tissue4.81e-093
trachea1.04e-083
respiratory airway1.04e-083
tracheobronchial tree1.04e-083
lower respiratory tract1.04e-083
dense mesenchyme tissue2.50e-0811
paraxial mesoderm2.50e-0811
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.50e-0811
aorta7.45e-074
artery7.45e-074
systemic artery7.45e-074
arterial blood vessel7.45e-074
systemic arterial system7.45e-074
aortic system7.45e-074
arterial system7.45e-074


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}