Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2168

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:00, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:99431624..99431637,+p3@Aqp6
Mm9::chr15:99431638..99431652,+p2@Aqp6
Mm9::chr15:99431803..99431813,+p4@Aqp6
Mm9::chr4:15808402..15808419,+p1@Calb1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005499vitamin D binding0.0103625798533696
GO:0015250water channel activity0.0103625798533696
GO:0005372water transporter activity0.0103625798533696
GO:0006833water transport0.0103625798533696
GO:0042044fluid transport0.0103625798533696
GO:0005496steroid binding0.0368606670208654



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)6.12e-1023
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)6.12e-1023
granule cell3.89e-073
neuron of the ventral spinal cord5.15e-073

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cavitated compound organ4.81e-2021
posterior neural tube5.92e-1612
chordal neural plate5.92e-1612
spinal cord3.91e-126
dorsal region element3.91e-126
dorsum3.91e-126
kidney2.01e-1114
kidney mesenchyme2.01e-1114
upper urinary tract2.01e-1114
kidney rudiment2.01e-1114
kidney field2.01e-1114
regional part of spinal cord3.54e-105
gray matter of spinal cord3.54e-105
urinary system structure1.87e-0818
central nervous system4.21e-0873
renal system6.56e-0819
compound organ7.36e-0843
nervous system9.49e-0875
neural tube3.14e-0752
neural rod3.14e-0752
future spinal cord3.14e-0752
neural keel3.14e-0752
ventral horn of spinal cord5.15e-073


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}