Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C854

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C854_argyrophil_CD4_anaplastic_smallcell_nonsmall_seminal_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr2:109237631..109237648,+ p22@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237654..109237689,+ p8@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237690..109237715,+ p4@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237717..109237729,+ p14@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237734..109237743,+ p20@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237750..109237773,+ p9@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237793..109237813,+ p11@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237834..109237845,+ p21@LIMS1
Hg19::chr2:109237851..109237860,+ p24@LIMS1
Hg19::chr3:73500307..73500316,- p@chr3:73500307..73500316
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
blood6.43e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid6.43e-0815
organism substance6.43e-0815


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0250581
MA0004.10.380329
MA0006.10.236135
MA0007.10.952442
MA0009.10.828613
MA0014.10.0036779
MA0017.11.36636
MA0019.10.520264
MA0024.10.725404
MA0025.10.960689
MA0027.12.43535
MA0028.10.25013
MA0029.10.744375
MA0030.10.733118
MA0031.10.669876
MA0038.10.477043
MA0040.14.28125
MA0041.10.397617
MA0042.10.367902
MA0043.10.828925
MA0046.10.817858
MA0048.10.0613414
MA0050.11.71671
MA0051.10.473017
MA0052.10.753928
MA0055.10.014035
MA0056.10
MA0057.12.25468
MA0058.10.293055
MA0059.10.291897
MA0060.10.138988
MA0061.10.118318
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.477449
MA0067.11.1435
MA0068.10.0911063
MA0069.10.814052
MA0070.10.803003
MA0071.10.440254
MA0072.10.798564
MA0073.11.11021e-05
MA0074.10.4723
MA0076.10.307383
MA0077.10.790956
MA0078.10.568317
MA0081.10.292043
MA0083.10.836033
MA0084.11.32998
MA0087.13.11125
MA0088.10.0309101
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.320494
MA0091.10.382762
MA0092.10.918839
MA0093.10.238771
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.11.2287
MA0101.10.241637
MA0103.10.646502
MA0105.10.0508589
MA0106.10.516528
MA0107.10.179177
MA0108.20.666881
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.33284
MA0113.10.532314
MA0114.10.174997
MA0115.11.06753
MA0116.10.182037
MA0117.10.865782
MA0119.10.277531
MA0122.10.891407
MA0124.11.0263
MA0125.10.942948
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.585907
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.858623
MA0136.10.483775
MA0139.10.109245
MA0140.16.27444
MA0141.10.290336
MA0142.10.638837
MA0143.10.532484
MA0144.10.491079
MA0145.10.0359093
MA0146.10.00275056
MA0147.10.184931
MA0148.10.403564
MA0149.10.428597
MA0062.20.114378
MA0035.26.26886
MA0039.20.0317541
MA0138.20.569505
MA0002.20.129981
MA0137.20.710884
MA0104.20.138396
MA0047.20.504873
MA0112.20.0329985
MA0065.21.84778
MA0150.15.2081
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.443956
MA0153.10.926242
MA0154.10.185581
MA0155.10.296882
MA0156.10.715501
MA0157.10.612166
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.185458
MA0160.10.417847
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.00711618
MA0163.10.00405048
MA0164.10.544294
MA0080.20.671553
MA0018.20.517858
MA0099.22.93837
MA0079.21.20328
MA0102.21.36707
MA0258.10.155735
MA0259.10.191914
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F6#187694.515440158527654.07099158370721e-060.000129585580618957
EBF1#187998.01582016191212.54528393136776e-081.77217939005411e-06
ELF1#199793.832288162926781.71269377095518e-050.000392177208385853
GABPB1#255396.360915452563961.98087175550082e-071.07191847291581e-05
GATA1#2623912.20427732942046.00765320016021e-105.75626873918837e-08
GATA2#2624911.47043856019861.04515951919051e-099.65123032933137e-08
PAX5#5079106.669565531177835.73356832178391e-094.56408644785663e-07
POLR2A#543091.932707858902260.005980089183606110.0268141221984646
SPI1#668897.383891157670455.27911959243962e-083.35777083504751e-06
TAL1#6886926.88175500969625.09744402351568e-137.40433875343469e-11
TBP#690893.336093618386755.72847608179417e-050.000955255170855023
TRIM28#10155916.73147254073633.57564714790588e-114.10370343384771e-09
USF1#739195.725349349487165.02669067153904e-072.35312661158613e-05
ZBTB7A#5134196.61671837708831.39690928008423e-077.92459577961527e-06



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.