Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4408: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|id=C4408
|id=C4408
|kegg_enrichment=hsa04110;Cell_cycle;1.35E-06!hsa04114;Oocyte_meiosis;1.64E-06
|kegg_enrichment=hsa04110;Cell_cycle;1.35E-06!hsa04114;Oocyte_meiosis;1.64E-06
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000548!3.85e-25!679;CL:0000004!3.85e-25!679;CL:0000255!3.85e-25!679;CL:0000012!1.17e-24!682;CL:0000066!5.79e-22!254;CL:0000003!5.04e-15!722;CL:0002321!7.06e-14!248;CL:0000220!3.76e-13!246;CL:0000063!9.66e-11!578;CL:0000144!2.95e-10!625;CL:0000055!8.61e-09!180;CL:0000221!4.32e-08!71;CL:0000076!1.70e-07!62;CL:0002371!4.00e-07!591;CL:0000133!4.59e-07!59
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000548!4.40e-25!679;CL:0000255!4.40e-25!679;CL:0000066!6.21e-22!253;CL:0000003!6.06e-15!722;CL:0002321!5.81e-14!250;CL:0000221!4.15e-08!72;CL:0000333!1.69e-07!41;CL:0000133!2.51e-07!59;CL:0000055!4.56e-07!106;CL:0002371!7.74e-07!588
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:162!1.43e-39!235;DOID:14566!2.65e-38!239;DOID:0050687!2.73e-19!143;DOID:0050686!2.82e-18!137;DOID:305!4.59e-16!106;DOID:2531!3.05e-14!51;DOID:0060083!3.05e-14!51;DOID:1240!6.96e-10!39;DOID:8692!1.61e-07!31
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:162!7.55e-38!235;DOID:14566!1.20e-36!239;DOID:0050687!4.63e-18!143;DOID:0050686!1.11e-17!137;DOID:305!4.20e-15!106;DOID:2531!4.23e-14!51;DOID:0060083!4.23e-14!51;DOID:1240!1.00e-09!39;DOID:8692!3.25e-07!31
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=
|pathway_enrichment=1.99497924496294e-05;0.00420940620687181;2;128;Cell cycle (KEGG):04110!1.58091305570944e-05;0.00420940620687181;2;114;Oocyte meiosis (KEGG):04114!9.83008350895251e-06;0.00420940620687181;2;90;Cell cycle (Wikipathways):WP179!0.00014649401603791;0.0231826780379993;2;346;{CDC2,351} (Static Module):NA
|pathway_enrichment=1.99497924496294e-05;0.00420940620687181;2;128;Cell cycle (KEGG):04110!1.58091305570944e-05;0.00420940620687181;2;114;Oocyte meiosis (KEGG):04114!9.83008350895251e-06;0.00420940620687181;2;90;Cell cycle (Wikipathways):WP179!0.00014649401603791;0.0231826780379993;2;346;{CDC2,351} (Static Module):NA

Revision as of 15:56, 19 October 2012


Full id: C4408_fibrous_Reticulocytes_carcinoid_testicular_iPS_alveolar_teratocarcinoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:37962018..37962027,+p1@PTTG2
Hg19::chr5:159848807..159848847,+p2@PTTG1
Hg19::chr5:159848854..159848878,+p1@PTTG1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


p.valueFDRnGenesnPathwayName
1.99497924496294e-050.004209406206871812128Cell cycle (KEGG):04110
1.58091305570944e-050.004209406206871812114Oocyte meiosis (KEGG):04114
9.83008350895251e-060.00420940620687181290Cell cycle (Wikipathways):WP179
0.000146494016037910.02318267803799932346{CDC2,351} (Static Module):NA



Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0051276chromosome organization and biogenesis0.0121754551432509
GO:0006259DNA metabolic process0.0295510600856273
GO:0006996organelle organization and biogenesis0.0295510600856273
GO:0004869cysteine protease inhibitor activity0.0295510600856273
GO:0007059chromosome segregation0.0340107387499807



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
animal cell4.40e-25679
eukaryotic cell4.40e-25679
epithelial cell6.21e-22253
native cell6.06e-15722
embryonic cell5.81e-14250
ectodermal cell4.15e-0872
migratory neural crest cell1.69e-0741
neurectodermal cell2.51e-0759
non-terminally differentiated cell4.56e-07106
somatic cell7.74e-07588
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer7.55e-38235
disease of cellular proliferation1.20e-36239
cell type cancer4.63e-18143
organ system cancer1.11e-17137
carcinoma4.20e-15106
hematologic cancer4.23e-1451
immune system cancer4.23e-1451
leukemia1.00e-0939
myeloid leukemia3.25e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA3#2625218.15767757147070.003944546819279620.0189565859220847
NANOG#79923219.49651898734180.003427255648501020.0174578916584792



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.