Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2562

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2562_Urothelial_Gingival_Keratinocyte_Mammary_Bronchial_Small_Mallassezderived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:209826369..209826380,-p@chr1:209826369..209826380
-
Hg19::chr1:209826396..209826431,-p@chr1:209826396..209826431
-
Hg19::chr1:209826442..209826464,-p@chr1:209826442..209826464
-
Hg19::chr1:209826486..209826491,-p@chr1:209826486..209826491
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure4.43e-23160
endoderm4.43e-23160
presumptive endoderm4.43e-23160
digestive system1.04e-15145
digestive tract1.04e-15145
primitive gut1.04e-15145
subdivision of digestive tract1.41e-13118
urinary system structure1.68e-1347
renal system5.24e-1348
respiratory system1.64e-1274
respiratory tract1.96e-1254
respiratory primordium2.98e-1238
endoderm of foregut2.98e-1238
endo-epithelium2.09e-1082
extraembryonic membrane5.68e-1014
membranous layer5.68e-1014
epithelial bud9.10e-1037
segment of respiratory tract2.18e-0847
epithelial fold4.63e-0847
organ4.75e-08503
thoracic cavity element6.41e-0834
thoracic cavity6.41e-0834
foregut7.16e-0887
thoracic segment organ1.60e-0735
chorion2.02e-077
trunk region element3.00e-07101
tracheobronchial tree3.04e-0715
lower respiratory tract3.04e-0715
transitional epithelium4.10e-076
urothelium5.85e-075
organ part7.54e-07218
mucosa8.43e-0720
nephron tubule epithelium9.47e-0710
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.53e-20106
cell type cancer5.28e-15143
squamous cell carcinoma5.23e-1014
adenocarcinoma7.50e-0925


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0938548
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.13.53539
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.11.62583
MA0089.10
MA0090.12.61689
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.13.36866
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.11.1497
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.11.15856
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.116.71
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.569905
MA0146.11.25938
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.483275
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.98779
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.21.65877
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.12.08227
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.21.85039
MA0079.20.869502
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106541521290241
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.00434487817847948
ESR1#2099430.76860329615451.11467714392546e-064.610525395423e-05
JUN#3725412.51282919233634.07770316866756e-050.00074362011739562
JUNB#3726430.61063265982111.13787152942193e-064.66032018279597e-05
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.00391901195083592
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00157139068550556
SMARCB1#6598418.25271578115749.00423392720929e-060.000241746320597381
SMC3#9126415.04493284493281.95092670935632e-050.00043817813892143
STAT3#6774410.51946499715428.16377768286615e-050.00123192714552934
TFAP2A#7020416.5186343730451.34240829060362e-050.000326653726613121
TFAP2C#7022410.80922860986027.32289634782688e-050.00114593343073223



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.