Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3821

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3821_lung_seminal_small_salivary_parotid_ductus_colon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr19:54676833..54676838,- p3@TMC4
Hg19::chr19:54676846..54676872,- p1@TMC4
Hg19::chr19:54676884..54676893,- p2@TMC4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure3.32e-25160
endoderm3.32e-25160
presumptive endoderm3.32e-25160
digestive system2.46e-20145
digestive tract2.46e-20145
primitive gut2.46e-20145
subdivision of digestive tract2.47e-17118
respiratory system1.49e-1474
anatomical space4.68e-1395
endo-epithelium4.95e-1382
immaterial anatomical entity1.97e-11117
epithelial bud2.73e-1137
trunk region element4.36e-11101
thoracic cavity element6.43e-1134
thoracic cavity6.43e-1134
respiratory tract6.98e-1154
thoracic segment organ2.02e-1035
foregut1.51e-0987
epithelial fold1.87e-0947
thoracic segment of trunk2.73e-0952
organism subdivision5.17e-09264
subdivision of trunk5.46e-09112
urinary system structure1.38e-0847
intestine2.44e-0817
orifice2.83e-0836
renal system2.89e-0848
lung3.22e-0822
respiratory tube3.22e-0822
respiration organ3.22e-0822
pair of lungs3.22e-0822
lung primordium3.22e-0822
lung bud3.22e-0822
gastrointestinal system1.24e-0725
reproductive structure1.31e-0759
reproductive system1.31e-0759
respiratory primordium3.05e-0738
endoderm of foregut3.05e-0738
organ3.36e-07503
respiratory system epithelium3.89e-0728
urothelium4.40e-075
male organism5.67e-0722
male reproductive system5.67e-0722
male reproductive organ8.68e-0711
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.26e-18106
cell type cancer7.77e-13143
squamous cell carcinoma2.51e-1214
adenocarcinoma5.95e-1225


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.13.22681
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.11.88666
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.715722
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.12.36034
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.12.18164
MA0139.12.91906
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.62945
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.22.08438
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.22.13692
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.13.19371
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.12.7096
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.37721
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.776149
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.21.55139
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.69213
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190048425066085
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279444126869868
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00915091023515678
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462294227514793
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00581209620833851
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0154107260223909
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294501526630953
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00543029389921847
ZEB1#6935316.88843201754390.0002075486917327580.00242761538983957



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.