Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1094: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=1.06693212190836,0

Latest revision as of 11:37, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1094_salivary_submaxillary_thyroid_parotid_skeletal_Preadipocyte_Adipocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:120885918..120885931,+p8@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120885933..120885947,+p4@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120885949..120885976,+p1@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120885982..120885993,+p6@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120886006..120886025,+p2@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120886031..120886042,+p5@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120886054..120886078,+p3@DEPTOR
Hg19::chr8:120886102..120886125,+p7@DEPTOR


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.49e-30114
neural tube4.46e-1656
neural rod4.46e-1656
future spinal cord4.46e-1656
neural keel4.46e-1656
regional part of nervous system1.03e-1453
regional part of brain1.03e-1453
central nervous system1.28e-1481
brain4.96e-1468
future brain4.96e-1468
nervous system3.24e-1389
regional part of forebrain1.03e-1241
forebrain1.03e-1241
anterior neural tube1.03e-1241
future forebrain1.03e-1241
organ system subdivision3.15e-12223
telencephalon6.63e-1034
brain grey matter8.66e-1034
gray matter8.66e-1034
regional part of cerebral cortex2.43e-0922
regional part of telencephalon5.39e-0932
cerebral hemisphere5.57e-0932
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.80e-09132
neocortex1.14e-0820
neural plate3.13e-0882
presumptive neural plate3.13e-0882
tube2.22e-07192
neurectoderm2.25e-0786
organ4.41e-07503


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.06829
MA0004.10.455723
MA0006.10.300178
MA0007.10.437331
MA0009.10.918715
MA0014.12.6969
MA0017.10.337901
MA0019.10.602411
MA0024.10.813542
MA0025.11.05265
MA0027.12.5321
MA0028.10.315574
MA0029.10.832916
MA0030.10.821423
MA0031.10.756713
MA0038.10.557409
MA0040.13.24463
MA0041.10.474018
MA0042.13.98496
MA0043.10.919032
MA0046.10.90778
MA0048.10.316923
MA0050.10.443405
MA0051.10.553205
MA0052.10.842664
MA0055.10.524515
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.0912556
MA0058.10.362328
MA0059.10.361075
MA0060.10.556724
MA0061.10.497495
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.557833
MA0067.11.23721
MA0068.10.133123
MA0069.10.903908
MA0070.10.892666
MA0071.10.518907
MA0072.10.888148
MA0073.19.20286e-05
MA0074.10.552456
MA0076.10.377799
MA0077.10.880402
MA0078.10.652193
MA0081.10.361233
MA0083.10.926258
MA0084.11.42483
MA0087.10.885691
MA0088.10.054222
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.391903
MA0091.12.02209
MA0092.10.421159
MA0093.10.303084
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.571227
MA0101.10.30624
MA0103.10.291333
MA0105.10.988431
MA0106.10.59853
MA0107.10.236528
MA0108.20.753643
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.405141
MA0113.11.49247
MA0114.10.231781
MA0115.11.1606
MA0116.10.673701
MA0117.10.956472
MA0119.10.345493
MA0122.10.982472
MA0124.11.11898
MA0125.11.0347
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.670358
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.949204
MA0136.10.564434
MA0139.10.155155
MA0140.10.516266
MA0141.10.359385
MA0142.10.724856
MA0143.10.615094
MA0144.10.218541
MA0145.11.25866
MA0146.10.0399277
MA0147.10.243042
MA0148.10.480298
MA0149.10.506665
MA0062.20.161302
MA0035.20.515566
MA0039.29.19528
MA0138.20.653421
MA0002.21.01797
MA0137.20.321796
MA0104.20.189646
MA0047.20.586412
MA0112.25.66701
MA0065.20.0631316
MA0150.10.386144
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.52279
MA0153.11.01778
MA0154.10.577214
MA0155.110.6887
MA0156.10.323987
MA0157.10.697424
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.243637
MA0160.10.495355
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0163939
MA0163.10.493198
MA0164.10.627336
MA0080.20.303167
MA0018.20.599912
MA0099.20.523145
MA0079.21.5021
MA0102.21.46209
MA0258.16.09428
MA0259.10.699589
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066485.360256373075031.46631949289063e-065.66768843515931e-05
E2F1#186953.067118259299580.01129732364974160.0414458755323648
ELF1#199784.258097958807549.24826870984006e-060.000246586657081181
FOXA1#3169811.08141974938554.39110036332964e-093.56334212001387e-07
GTF2F1#2962812.73966087675771.43868108630934e-091.28422576045351e-07
HEY1#2346284.040111043105711.4081650274634e-050.0003393339808566
IRF1#365987.63716375356398.63190100943299e-085.13386736631077e-06
MXI1#460189.96157162875931.02988186499756e-087.78291115039651e-07
POLR2A#543082.147453176558070.002210725788971910.0127273022807142
RFX5#5993812.04791082719512.24894609348582e-091.92050434225319e-07
SIN3A#2594285.408884726815141.36410592556506e-065.35787359007481e-05
SIX5#147912817.0867153554591.37300676536722e-101.46471351959333e-08
SP1#666785.69838137814098.98832477855329e-073.86786836237053e-05
SRF#6722813.79717826216787.60038632817713e-107.190006772903e-08
TAF1#687283.343046285745296.40776711117462e-050.00104402619239308
TBP#690883.706770687096392.80450451364125e-050.000592554414121339
THAP1#55145831.36914460285131.06164581143752e-121.49229107537985e-10
USF1#739186.361499277207963.72538670743375e-071.83439727646239e-05
YY1#752884.911170749853862.95299276601526e-060.000101084107338534
ZNF263#1012788.221841637010684.78378813558924e-083.10705254410948e-06



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.