Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3618

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:34, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3618_acute_granulocyte_CD133_CD34_renal_Dendritic_chronic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:263898..263910,-p1@ENST00000466740
Hg19::chr1:44889697..44889716,+p11@RNF220
Hg19::chr1:44889718..44889726,+p26@RNF220


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism7.49e-15115
regional part of forebrain9.32e-1141
forebrain9.32e-1141
future forebrain9.32e-1141
anterior neural tube2.55e-1042
telencephalon4.23e-1034
regional part of telencephalon1.17e-0933
cerebral hemisphere4.65e-0932
gray matter4.72e-0934
brain grey matter4.72e-0934
brain6.97e-0969
future brain6.97e-0969
cerebral cortex1.05e-0825
pallium1.05e-0825
blood3.34e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid3.34e-0815
organism substance3.34e-0815
regional part of brain1.69e-0759
neural tube1.98e-0757
neural rod1.98e-0757
future spinal cord1.98e-0757
neural keel1.98e-0757
neocortex7.63e-0720
regional part of cerebral cortex9.42e-0722
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukemia5.81e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA3#2625218.15767757147070.003944546819279620.0189461242300747



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.