Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1987

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:13, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1987_CD14_cord_CD4_CD8_embryonic_Natural_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:138748466..138748470,-p@chr7:138748466..138748470
-
Hg19::chr7:138772774..138772778,-p@chr7:138772774..138772778
-
Hg19::chr7:138779240..138779244,-p@chr7:138779240..138779244
-
Hg19::chr7:138793014..138793017,-p@chr7:138793014..138793017
-
Hg19::chr7:138794453..138794473,-p1@ZC3HAV1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell3.08e-42168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.08e-42168
hematopoietic cell4.62e-41177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.84e-40161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.84e-40161
leukocyte1.04e-37136
nongranular leukocyte1.21e-34115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.63e-34120
nucleate cell3.93e-2355
lymphocyte5.10e-2253
common lymphoid progenitor5.10e-2253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.07e-2152
myeloid cell4.05e-18108
common myeloid progenitor4.05e-18108
T cell2.38e-1625
pro-T cell2.38e-1625
myeloid leukocyte1.13e-1472
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.05e-1466
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.64e-1367
classical monocyte2.82e-1242
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.82e-1242
mature alpha-beta T cell5.68e-1218
alpha-beta T cell5.68e-1218
immature T cell5.68e-1218
mature T cell5.68e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell5.68e-1218
monopoietic cell1.61e-1159
monocyte1.61e-1159
monoblast1.61e-1159
promonocyte1.61e-1159
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.10e-1061
defensive cell1.12e-1048
phagocyte1.12e-1048
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system7.48e-1998
blood island7.48e-1998
hemolymphoid system4.70e-18108
immune system3.98e-1393
bone marrow5.88e-1176
bone element6.80e-1182
skeletal element1.64e-0890
skeletal system6.08e-07100
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer9.88e-1051
immune system cancer9.88e-1051
leukemia7.04e-0739


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HDAC8#558691155.3168067226890.006421962435230970.0279296799688968



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.