Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1348

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:10, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1348_Neutrophils_Natural_CD8_Mast_CD19_CD4_Eosinophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:65188819..65188833,-p@chr11:65188819..65188833
-
Hg19::chr16:27325812..27325826,-p@chr16:27325812..27325826
-
Hg19::chr1:198626826..198626837,+p@chr1:198626826..198626837
+
Hg19::chr1:226250506..226250548,+p2@H3F3AP4
Hg19::chr7:130791254..130791306,+p@chr7:130791254..130791306
+
Hg19::chr7:130791323..130791333,+p@chr7:130791323..130791333
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte4.40e-36140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.53e-28124
nongranular leukocyte1.33e-26119
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.98e-2442
hematopoietic stem cell2.53e-23172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.53e-23172
classical monocyte8.82e-2345
hematopoietic cell1.98e-22182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.21e-20165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.21e-20165
myeloid leukocyte4.09e-2076
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell8.72e-1671
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.52e-1570
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.02e-1465
monopoietic cell2.40e-1363
monocyte2.40e-1363
monoblast2.40e-1363
promonocyte2.40e-1363
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.87e-1252
lymphocyte8.13e-1253
common lymphoid progenitor8.13e-1253
mesenchymal cell5.59e-10358
connective tissue cell6.20e-10365
mature alpha-beta T cell8.31e-1018
alpha-beta T cell8.31e-1018
immature T cell8.31e-1018
mature T cell8.31e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell8.31e-1018
myeloid cell8.50e-10112
common myeloid progenitor8.50e-10112
T cell5.96e-0825
pro-T cell5.96e-0825
multi fate stem cell8.77e-07430
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.41e-21102
blood island4.41e-21102
hemolymphoid system1.45e-19112
bone marrow6.96e-1580
adult organism2.88e-13115
bone element6.56e-1386
connective tissue2.35e-09375
skeletal element2.46e-09101
skeletal system2.46e-09101
immune system9.21e-09115
blood6.06e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid6.06e-0815
organism substance6.06e-0815
lateral plate mesoderm1.01e-07216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.