Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2571

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:25, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2571_Mesothelial_merkel_Pericytes_mesenchymal_cervical_Meningeal_ovary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:22469330..22469371,+p@chr1:22469330..22469371
+
Hg19::chr1:22469532..22469541,-p4@WNT4
Hg19::chr1:22469582..22469595,-p1@WNT4
Hg19::chr1:22469609..22469630,-p2@WNT4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell4.48e-0843
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.58e-16115
organism subdivision5.86e-14365
endoderm-derived structure1.17e-10169
endoderm1.17e-10169
presumptive endoderm1.17e-10169
organ part2.16e-10219
anterior region of body1.53e-09129
craniocervical region1.53e-09129
neural tube2.76e-0957
neural rod2.76e-0957
future spinal cord2.76e-0957
neural keel2.76e-0957
digestive system3.33e-09155
digestive tract3.33e-09155
primitive gut3.33e-09155
ectoderm-derived structure3.81e-09169
regional part of brain5.24e-0959
ectoderm5.27e-09173
presumptive ectoderm5.27e-09173
head6.32e-09123
multi-tissue structure1.23e-08347
regional part of nervous system1.47e-0894
nervous system1.47e-0894
central nervous system2.21e-0882
organ3.15e-08511
subdivision of digestive tract3.46e-08129
endodermal part of digestive tract3.46e-08129
multi-cellular organism4.05e-08659
brain1.26e-0769
future brain1.26e-0769
neural plate1.38e-0786
presumptive neural plate1.38e-0786
immaterial anatomical entity2.04e-07126
neurectoderm2.44e-0790


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.