Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4098

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:43, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4098_Renal_mesothelioma_Fibroblast_Osteoblast_Mesothelial_Sebocyte_embryonic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr22:37962218..37962256,+p7@CDC42EP1
Hg19::chr22:37962364..37962387,+p6@CDC42EP1
Hg19::chr22:37962624..37962665,+p3@CDC42EP1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic cell1.49e-17248
non-terminally differentiated cell1.03e-14180
epithelial cell1.43e-12254
mesodermal cell1.10e-11119
fibroblast4.16e-0975
lining cell2.40e-0757
barrier cell2.40e-0757
squamous epithelial cell8.63e-0762
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision9.87e-22365
multi-tissue structure3.27e-18347
cell layer5.33e-18312
anatomical cluster1.16e-17286
epithelium2.18e-17309
anatomical conduit1.52e-15241
trunk1.55e-14216
mesenchyme3.24e-13238
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.24e-13238
trunk mesenchyme6.66e-13143
multi-cellular organism1.48e-12659
epithelial tube3.10e-12118
tube6.99e-12194
anatomical system4.60e-11625
anatomical group6.99e-11626
organ part2.03e-10219
unilaminar epithelium5.90e-10138
germ layer1.53e-08604
embryonic tissue1.53e-08604
presumptive structure1.53e-08604
epiblast (generic)1.53e-08604
embryonic structure1.97e-08605
developing anatomical structure1.97e-08605
embryo3.13e-08612
subdivision of trunk4.33e-08113
vasculature7.17e-0879
vascular system7.17e-0879
abdominal segment of trunk1.12e-0761
abdomen1.12e-0761
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.44e-0784


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.