Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C692

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:24, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C692_Mast_Eosinophils_Neutrophils_Basophils_immature_CD4_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:72452530..72452552,-p@chr11:72452530..72452552
-
Hg19::chr12:123373187..123373212,-p1@AK022083
Hg19::chr14:75744006..75744015,+p@chr14:75744006..75744015
+
Hg19::chr14:88471693..88471723,+p@chr14:88471693..88471723
+
Hg19::chr17:41466011..41466040,+p@chr17:41466011..41466040
+
Hg19::chr19:49377361..49377372,+p@chr19:49377361..49377372
+
Hg19::chr19:54692373..54692384,+p@chr19:54692373..54692384
+
Hg19::chr1:100818396..100818420,-p@chr1:100818396..100818420
-
Hg19::chr20:34359925..34359991,+p1@PHF20
Hg19::chr20:34361372..34361410,+p@chr20:34361372..34361410
+
Hg19::chr2:129079621..129079634,+p@chr2:129079621..129079634
+
Hg19::chr6:35311353..35311364,-p@chr6:35311353..35311364
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.14e-8142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.14e-8142
myeloid leukocyte3.24e-8172
leukocyte1.04e-74136
defensive cell6.39e-7048
phagocyte6.39e-7048
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.35e-6967
hematopoietic stem cell1.14e-64168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.14e-64168
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.53e-6466
hematopoietic cell1.91e-60177
myeloid cell3.57e-60108
common myeloid progenitor3.57e-60108
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.57e-6061
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.66e-60120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.02e-59161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.02e-59161
monopoietic cell2.60e-5659
monocyte2.60e-5659
monoblast2.60e-5659
promonocyte2.60e-5659
nongranular leukocyte9.27e-54115
stuff accumulating cell5.99e-3587
mesenchymal cell6.54e-21354
intermediate monocyte3.22e-209
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.22e-209
connective tissue cell3.82e-20361
motile cell3.33e-18386
granulocyte1.16e-158
stem cell1.50e-14441
multi fate stem cell3.64e-14427
somatic stem cell1.03e-13433
histamine secreting cell9.94e-135
biogenic amine secreting cell9.94e-135
granulocytopoietic cell9.94e-135
mast cell9.94e-135
mast cell progenitor9.94e-135
basophil mast progenitor cell9.94e-135
blood cell5.11e-1111
basophil1.63e-083
natural killer cell3.80e-083
pro-NK cell3.80e-083
single nucleate cell6.40e-083
mononuclear cell6.40e-083
non-classical monocyte3.10e-073
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte3.10e-073
endocrine cell7.66e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow2.15e-6276
bone element7.65e-5782
hematopoietic system3.05e-5298
blood island3.05e-5298
skeletal element1.39e-5090
immune system1.63e-4893
hemolymphoid system4.46e-46108
skeletal system3.65e-44100
musculoskeletal system4.94e-21167
connective tissue4.23e-19371
lateral plate mesoderm6.67e-18203
mesoderm5.83e-08315
mesoderm-derived structure5.83e-08315
presumptive mesoderm5.83e-08315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCFL#14069046.582158119658120.00234244376012790.0132777467497421
GATA3#262549.078838785735340.0007088882425015890.0056976742464694
JUNB#372637.652658164955280.006142540980944890.0271577697700831
POLR2A#5430101.789544313798390.01056859658770230.0390522806051175
SIRT6#51548225.60640066500420.002675327429872020.0147484044047719
SPI1#668853.418468128551140.01014461279531980.0378985983592219
TAL1#688637.467154169360050.00657536370072610.0280983800957501
ZBTB7A#5134184.901272871917263.46590017012669e-050.000680020942828972



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.