Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2759

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:42, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2759_CD14_CD8_immature_Natural_CD34_CD19_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:9440425..9440445,-p2@ENST00000519043
Hg19::chr3:9440451..9440496,-p1@ENST00000519043
Hg19::chr4:139937032..139937054,+p2@CCRN4L
Hg19::chr9:131710317..131710335,-p3@DOLK


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004605phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase activity0.00671121183306963



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.20e-36136
nongranular leukocyte2.03e-26115
hematopoietic stem cell2.17e-26168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.17e-26168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.60e-26120
hematopoietic cell6.33e-26177
classical monocyte9.41e-2642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte9.41e-2642
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.47e-23161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.47e-23161
myeloid leukocyte5.63e-2172
defensive cell1.26e-1948
phagocyte1.26e-1948
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.10e-1967
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.80e-1761
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.58e-1666
monopoietic cell3.67e-1659
monocyte3.67e-1659
monoblast3.67e-1659
promonocyte3.67e-1659
myeloid cell8.20e-14108
common myeloid progenitor8.20e-14108
lymphocyte3.34e-0953
common lymphoid progenitor3.34e-0953
stem cell5.14e-09441
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.68e-0952
lymphocyte of B lineage1.37e-0824
pro-B cell1.37e-0824
nucleate cell2.53e-0855
multi fate stem cell3.74e-08427
dendritic cell9.44e-0810
mesenchymal cell9.91e-08354
animal cell1.06e-07679
eukaryotic cell1.06e-07679
native cell2.17e-07722
somatic stem cell2.65e-07433
stuff accumulating cell7.15e-0787
connective tissue cell9.90e-07361
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.04e-1576
immune system1.42e-1593
hematopoietic system1.14e-1498
blood island1.14e-1498
hemolymphoid system1.41e-14108
bone element5.20e-1482
skeletal element5.35e-1290
skeletal system6.18e-09100
lateral plate mesoderm6.55e-07203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL3#602217.27355140186920.004834494208076070.0226783031170166
FOXA1#316938.311064812039090.002740138182109850.0150397988018378
NFKB1#479045.488063424193840.001102199566301980.00768904017801164
POU2F2#545249.106124057742520.000145395665174930.00188562993607407
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244777592087027



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.