Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2631

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2631_chronic_pineal_gall_teratocarcinoma_testicular_choriocarcinoma_cholangiocellular



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr21:39493435..39493461,- p1@DSCR4
Hg19::chr21:39493560..39493573,+ p2@DSCR8
Hg19::chr21:39493574..39493607,+ p1@DSCR8
Hg19::chr21:39493611..39493629,+ p3@DSCR8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
pigment epithelium of eye9.50e-1311
sense organ1.24e-1124
sensory system1.24e-1124
entire sense organ system1.24e-1124
atypical epithelium4.83e-104
eye2.09e-0921
visual system2.09e-0921
acellular anatomical structure8.82e-093
egg chorion8.82e-093
camera-type eye4.56e-0820
simple eye4.56e-0820
immature eye4.56e-0820
ocular region4.56e-0820
eyeball of camera-type eye4.56e-0820
optic cup4.56e-0820
optic vesicle4.56e-0820
eye primordium4.56e-0820
ciliary epithelium6.42e-083
ciliary body6.42e-083
anterior segment of eyeball1.55e-0714
face3.48e-0722
anterior region of body9.88e-0762
craniocervical region9.88e-0762
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
chronic leukemia1.90e-088


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0214529
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.524262
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.12.98182
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.13.85927
MA0038.11.92746
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.11.92841
MA0067.13.36035
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.11.4709
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.11.83481
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.15.34177
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.483275
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.21.65877
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.649108
MA0155.13.05999
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.12.23474
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.03616
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.000248021
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ELF1#199744.258097958807540.003041525565781240.0161033097721092
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195058660062136
GTF2B#2959431.94382993432429.59435337635006e-074.09156664872448e-05
GTF2F1#2962412.73966087675773.79492332235515e-050.000718784905446953
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0186294871554548
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00307792792326129
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.003919716239083
MXI1#460149.96157162875930.0001015224754950450.00142550495001707
NFYA#4800418.42558069983058.67100748407158e-060.000234730780360019
NFYB#4801416.75979325353651.26678572070404e-050.00031159169544185
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00157241679931352
SIRT6#515484153.6384039900251.78585744852249e-091.55427638388534e-07
SP2#6668426.15353049384462.13562021071447e-067.74989712254374e-05
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.032263308367953
TAL1#6886429.86861667744021.25525650806991e-065.04416061740335e-05
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244550334938884



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.