Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3270

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3270_giant_testicular_gastric_ductal_Fibroblast_anaplastic_basal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:26111591..26111662,+p1@RASSF8
Hg19::chr12:26111665..26111684,+p5@RASSF8
Hg19::chr12:26111706..26111717,+p4@RASSF8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast2.65e-1376
non-terminally differentiated cell3.60e-09106
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.12e-14132
multi-cellular organism9.26e-14656
anatomical group2.67e-12625
anatomical system3.72e-12624
anatomical cluster5.04e-12373
multi-tissue structure3.10e-10342
vasculature9.10e-0978
vascular system9.10e-0978
ectoderm-derived structure9.14e-09171
ectoderm9.14e-09171
presumptive ectoderm9.14e-09171
epithelium1.04e-08306
dense mesenchyme tissue1.28e-0873
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.56e-0883
cell layer1.60e-08309
somite3.22e-0871
presomitic mesoderm3.22e-0871
presumptive segmental plate3.22e-0871
dermomyotome3.22e-0871
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.22e-0871
paraxial mesoderm3.49e-0872
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.49e-0872
anatomical conduit5.62e-08240
neural plate7.32e-0882
presumptive neural plate7.32e-0882
systemic artery2.46e-0733
systemic arterial system2.46e-0733
body cavity or lining2.52e-0749
body cavity3.52e-0746
vessel5.96e-0768
neurectoderm7.64e-0786
circulatory system8.30e-07112
heart9.09e-0724
primitive heart tube9.09e-0724
primary heart field9.09e-0724
anterior lateral plate mesoderm9.09e-0724
heart tube9.09e-0724
heart primordium9.09e-0724
cardiac mesoderm9.09e-0724
cardiogenic plate9.09e-0724
heart rudiment9.09e-0724
artery9.26e-0742
arterial blood vessel9.26e-0742
arterial system9.26e-0742
cardiovascular system9.28e-07109


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.14.57391
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.19.33321
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.407479
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.16.29911
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.80901
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.15.59223
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.15.85055
MA0146.15.33893
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.15877
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.22.07067
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.19.09554
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.21.54885
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189408324714058
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0278605955234503
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324016151613499
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0320858477655601
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319430380236206
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0185969265590305



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.