Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3718

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3718_CD14_Mast_Natural_Eosinophils_Basophils_CD8_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:3448390..3448411,+p14@TGIF1
Hg19::chr18:3448422..3448439,+p11@TGIF1
Hg19::chr18:3448730..3448744,+p@chr18:3448730..3448744
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.90e-2542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.90e-2542
defensive cell6.28e-2348
phagocyte6.28e-2348
myeloid leukocyte7.35e-2372
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.09e-2167
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.75e-2166
leukocyte1.41e-20136
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.76e-2061
monopoietic cell2.69e-1959
monocyte2.69e-1959
monoblast2.69e-1959
promonocyte2.69e-1959
myeloid cell4.81e-19108
common myeloid progenitor4.81e-19108
hematopoietic stem cell3.02e-18168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.02e-18168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell6.57e-18120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.34e-17161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.34e-17161
hematopoietic cell6.42e-16177
nongranular leukocyte8.26e-16115
animal cell5.47e-14679
eukaryotic cell5.47e-14679
native cell1.04e-13722
stem cell3.33e-13441
multi fate stem cell1.25e-12427
mesenchymal cell2.57e-12354
somatic stem cell5.92e-12433
connective tissue cell6.03e-12361
stuff accumulating cell7.60e-1287
motile cell1.28e-10386
somatic cell5.10e-09588
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow4.05e-1976
bone element1.04e-1782
skeletal element2.70e-1590
immune system5.91e-1393
hematopoietic system1.94e-1298
blood island1.94e-1298
skeletal system4.25e-12100
connective tissue1.84e-11371
hemolymphoid system1.61e-09108
musculoskeletal system3.02e-08167
lateral plate mesoderm5.38e-08203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.708947
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.377374
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.12.45333
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.12.37507
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.11.23283
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.12.75836
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.12.19699
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.12.26598
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.195278
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.22.08438
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.21.90288
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189907759164199
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00660139035453248
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279282991000343
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00436797044774947
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321970357284591
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0461978452769222
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167397998281186
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.0089712386726732
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00242955357578129
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00387776906789049
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.00433677458505315
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00391186775069821
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108645504651502
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0127986824171522
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00444006173014276
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.000680273016294657
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156674320695281
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294300582382398
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00308799693875422
PBX3#5090214.60967512449610.006056122473217890.0268290721094551
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276509854619121
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00308931658517095
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109033351847342
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00642582982214932
TAL1#6886329.86861667744023.75103522793067e-050.000719739790868732
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00629034363553368
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00613328626081177
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329158137112871
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.010934664991106



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.