Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1941: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.729187565450341,

Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1941_Fibroblast_Nucleus_Mesenchymal_tenocyte_Anulus_Smooth_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:55095379..55095390,+p6@PDGFRA
Hg19::chr4:55095396..55095422,+p3@PDGFRA
Hg19::chr4:55095428..55095475,+p2@PDGFRA
Hg19::chr4:55095476..55095494,+p4@PDGFRA
Hg19::chr4:55162545..55162559,+p@chr4:55162545..55162559
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
dense mesenchyme tissue3.81e-1873
somite1.23e-1771
presomitic mesoderm1.23e-1771
presumptive segmental plate1.23e-1771
dermomyotome1.23e-1771
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.23e-1771
paraxial mesoderm1.29e-1772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.29e-1772
multi-tissue structure2.97e-16342
muscle tissue1.92e-1564
musculature1.92e-1564
musculature of body1.92e-1564
skeletal muscle tissue4.58e-1562
striated muscle tissue4.58e-1562
myotome4.58e-1562
epithelial vesicle3.45e-1478
multilaminar epithelium5.74e-1483
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.85e-13132
mesenchyme7.39e-12160
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.39e-12160
multi-cellular organism6.97e-11656
trunk mesenchyme1.17e-10122
adult organism1.25e-10114
anatomical cluster2.87e-10373
primary circulatory organ7.47e-1027
heart1.54e-0924
primitive heart tube1.54e-0924
primary heart field1.54e-0924
anterior lateral plate mesoderm1.54e-0924
heart tube1.54e-0924
heart primordium1.54e-0924
cardiac mesoderm1.54e-0924
cardiogenic plate1.54e-0924
heart rudiment1.54e-0924
tissue6.37e-09773
surface structure6.79e-0999
cell layer2.01e-08309
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.42e-0883
epithelium2.53e-08306
anatomical group5.14e-08625
anatomical system6.18e-08624
integument1.00e-0746
integumental system1.00e-0746
systemic artery2.40e-0733
systemic arterial system2.40e-0733
organism subdivision3.58e-07264
skin of body9.75e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0497246
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.11.48719
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.195817
MA0050.11.48918
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.288856
MA0056.10
MA0057.12.36624
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.11.28241
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.13.39561
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.11.52322
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.11.76068
MA0139.10.759606
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.11.67417
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.143081
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.11.57313
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.15493
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.21.20193
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.23.01999
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.449243
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.11.3196
MA0156.13.10266
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.11.00463
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.823998
MA0102.23.62459
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105146.376918100659850.001113944176677320.00765792626829925
EP300#203345.419153380978560.00209386927943890.0121254013681907
RAD21#588548.284027116365060.0004011622639122450.0038689616474957
YY1#752843.928936599883080.007193866269917620.0298545736058144



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.