Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2870: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.113194460030012,0

Latest revision as of 12:14, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2870_Smooth_leiomyoma_giant_Synoviocyte_Urothelial_Myoblast_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:86159765..86159820,+p1@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86159821..86159839,+p2@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86159843..86159854,+p4@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86203923..86203945,+p@chr6:86203923..86203945
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium4.42e-2183
organism subdivision6.39e-18264
unilaminar epithelium7.15e-18148
vasculature8.61e-1878
vascular system8.61e-1878
somite2.06e-1771
presomitic mesoderm2.06e-1771
presumptive segmental plate2.06e-1771
dermomyotome2.06e-1771
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.06e-1771
dense mesenchyme tissue2.66e-1773
epithelial vesicle3.34e-1778
paraxial mesoderm4.62e-1772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.62e-1772
cell layer1.44e-16309
surface structure4.06e-1699
epithelium9.63e-16306
trunk mesenchyme2.26e-15122
vessel2.49e-1568
artery4.34e-1542
arterial blood vessel4.34e-1542
arterial system4.34e-1542
epithelial tube open at both ends7.13e-1559
blood vessel7.13e-1559
blood vasculature7.13e-1559
vascular cord7.13e-1559
epithelial tube1.03e-14117
anatomical system7.12e-14624
skeletal muscle tissue1.05e-1362
striated muscle tissue1.05e-1362
myotome1.05e-1362
anatomical group1.42e-13625
mesenchyme1.82e-13160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.82e-13160
muscle tissue2.00e-1364
musculature2.00e-1364
musculature of body2.00e-1364
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.42e-1383
trunk4.55e-13199
systemic artery7.43e-1333
systemic arterial system7.43e-1333
multi-cellular organism1.73e-12656
multi-tissue structure7.29e-12342
cardiovascular system1.73e-11109
circulatory system2.15e-10112
anatomical conduit1.41e-09240
integument3.15e-0946
integumental system3.15e-0946
skin of body1.23e-0841
anatomical cluster1.25e-08373
organ component layer1.42e-0766
aorta3.60e-0721
aortic system3.60e-0721
head4.17e-0756
subdivision of skeletal system6.24e-0716
female organism6.77e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.45381
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.11.28887
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.12.41215
MA0146.11.75643
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.22.01147
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.98779
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.01696
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.23.12566
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.11.1691
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.309472
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.22.02192
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.0270533
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.14.94877
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187936.679850134926750.005184294118278910.0240630413501147
RXRA#6256315.055962854350.0004758307997303580.00434095849869313
SMARCB1#6598313.68953683586810.0006305783409379340.00518313956785903
TFAP2C#702238.106921457395170.002947011739866440.0157208580600629
ZNF263#1012736.166381227758010.006539814347975980.0279957236827587



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.