Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4202

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:49, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4202_Hepatic_Astrocyte_testicular_teratocarcinoma_synovial_basal_prostate



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:237076971..237076978,-p3@GBX2
Hg19::chr2:237076992..237077008,-p2@GBX2
Hg19::chr2:237077022..237077038,-p1@GBX2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endothelium6.06e-1218
blood vessel endothelium6.06e-1218
cardiovascular system endothelium6.06e-1218
posterior neural tube2.61e-1115
chordal neural plate2.61e-1115
endothelial tube7.84e-109
arterial system endothelium7.84e-109
endothelium of artery7.84e-109
simple squamous epithelium9.32e-1022
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.68e-0912
hindbrain2.68e-0912
presumptive hindbrain2.68e-0912
squamous epithelium2.70e-0925
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.68e-0813
regional part of nervous system6.25e-0894
nervous system6.25e-0894
anatomical cluster2.05e-07286
central nervous system2.75e-0782
tube4.82e-07194
regional part of metencephalon6.03e-079
metencephalon6.03e-079
future metencephalon6.03e-079
anatomical conduit6.66e-07241
parenchyma7.49e-0717
neural tube7.53e-0757
neural rod7.53e-0757
future spinal cord7.53e-0757
neural keel7.53e-0757
cortex8.45e-0716
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer1.86e-20143
carcinoma6.60e-16106
cancer1.43e-12235
disease of cellular proliferation4.04e-12239
germ cell and embryonal cancer4.14e-0722
germ cell cancer4.14e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.