Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2334

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:02, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2334_Neutrophils_Monocytederived_Whole_myeloma_CD14_blood_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:45010031..45010067,+p@chr15:45010031..45010067
+
Hg19::chr15:45010077..45010108,+p@chr15:45010077..45010108
+
Hg19::chr15:45010168..45010186,+p@chr15:45010168..45010186
+
Hg19::chr15:45010228..45010300,+p@chr15:45010228..45010300
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.56e-41140
nongranular leukocyte3.06e-37119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.68e-33124
hematopoietic stem cell4.94e-31172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.94e-31172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.07e-30165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.07e-30165
hematopoietic cell6.57e-30182
myeloid leukocyte2.33e-2776
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.22e-2665
monopoietic cell3.49e-2663
monocyte3.49e-2663
monoblast3.49e-2663
promonocyte3.49e-2663
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.63e-2471
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.71e-2342
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.00e-2270
classical monocyte7.26e-2245
myeloid cell6.46e-19112
common myeloid progenitor6.46e-19112
mesenchymal cell1.04e-12358
connective tissue cell5.14e-12365
lymphocyte9.19e-1153
common lymphoid progenitor9.19e-1153
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.01e-1052
multi fate stem cell5.63e-09430
somatic stem cell8.88e-08436
mature alpha-beta T cell1.19e-0718
alpha-beta T cell1.19e-0718
immature T cell1.19e-0718
mature T cell1.19e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell1.19e-0718
motile cell1.67e-07390
T cell2.66e-0725
pro-T cell2.66e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system7.19e-30112
hematopoietic system4.19e-29102
blood island4.19e-29102
bone marrow1.32e-2180
immune system7.22e-19115
bone element1.02e-1886
skeletal element7.43e-14101
skeletal system7.43e-14101
connective tissue1.74e-12375
blood4.44e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid4.44e-0815
organism substance4.44e-0815
lateral plate mesoderm3.19e-07216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00816438472300254



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.