Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2491

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:33, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr9:16303702..16303704,-p@chr9:16303702..16303704
-
Mm9::chr9:16306614..16306625,-p@chr9:16306614..16306625
-
Mm9::chr9:16306639..16306653,-p@chr9:16306639..16306653
-
Mm9::chr9:16306666..16306682,-p@chr9:16306666..16306682
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
pre-chordal neural plate6.30e-1549
neurectoderm2.79e-1464
neural plate2.79e-1464
presumptive neural plate2.79e-1464
neural tube4.37e-1252
neural rod4.37e-1252
future spinal cord4.37e-1252
neural keel4.37e-1252
regional part of nervous system6.13e-1254
ecto-epithelium8.60e-1273
anterior neural tube3.12e-1140
gray matter6.33e-1134
regional part of forebrain8.17e-1139
forebrain8.17e-1139
future forebrain8.17e-1139
brain1.39e-1047
future brain1.39e-1047
regional part of brain4.95e-1046
central nervous system2.40e-0973
brain grey matter2.66e-0929
regional part of telencephalon2.66e-0929
telencephalon2.66e-0929
ectoderm-derived structure4.90e-0995
ectoderm4.90e-0995
presumptive ectoderm4.90e-0995
nervous system1.04e-0875
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.85e-0892
multi-cellular organism2.81e-08333
occipital lobe5.47e-0710
visual cortex5.47e-0710
neocortex5.47e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}