Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1854

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:09, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1854_epididymis_CD4_CD19_CD14_CD14CD16_CD8_Macrophage



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:26644414..26644426,+p2@CD52
Hg19::chr1:26644441..26644455,+p1@CD52
Hg19::chr1:26646672..26646699,+p@chr1:26646672..26646699
+
Hg19::chr1:26646748..26646770,+p@chr1:26646748..26646770
+
Hg19::chr1:26646869..26646893,+p@chr1:26646869..26646893
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.92e-66136
nongranular leukocyte9.53e-65115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.08e-64120
hematopoietic stem cell6.74e-63168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.74e-63168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.72e-60161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.72e-60161
hematopoietic cell5.26e-58177
lymphocyte1.15e-3753
common lymphoid progenitor1.15e-3753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.09e-3652
nucleate cell1.00e-3555
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.23e-2767
defensive cell2.01e-2648
phagocyte2.01e-2648
myeloid leukocyte3.25e-2572
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.84e-2561
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.61e-2566
myeloid cell5.17e-24108
common myeloid progenitor5.17e-24108
classical monocyte6.14e-2442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte6.14e-2442
monopoietic cell3.92e-2359
monocyte3.92e-2359
monoblast3.92e-2359
promonocyte3.92e-2359
T cell1.02e-1725
pro-T cell1.02e-1725
lymphocyte of B lineage2.78e-1724
pro-B cell2.78e-1724
mature alpha-beta T cell3.19e-1618
alpha-beta T cell3.19e-1618
immature T cell3.19e-1618
mature T cell3.19e-1618
immature alpha-beta T cell3.19e-1618
B cell6.95e-1614
mesenchymal cell1.70e-13354
connective tissue cell1.06e-12361
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell7.45e-1111
motile cell5.86e-10386
stuff accumulating cell1.49e-0987
intermediate monocyte1.89e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.89e-089
multi fate stem cell8.47e-07427
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.51e-3298
blood island4.51e-3298
hemolymphoid system8.50e-30108
immune system1.02e-2393
bone marrow3.52e-2276
bone element1.59e-1982
skeletal element1.44e-1690
skeletal system1.38e-13100
connective tissue4.59e-12371
lateral plate mesoderm1.04e-07203
blood4.50e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid4.50e-0715
organism substance4.50e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187935.34388010794140.01187615563868110.0432382980808834



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.