Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3675

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:16, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3675_Mast_Whole_blood_acute_NK_Neutrophils_CD34



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:72733350..72733373,+p2@RAB37
Hg19::chr17:72733377..72733403,+p1@RAB37
Hg19::chr17:73839792..73839918,-p4@UNC13D


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell6.26e-61168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell6.26e-61168
hematopoietic cell3.73e-59177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.44e-57161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.44e-57161
leukocyte3.18e-45136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.48e-37120
nongranular leukocyte4.13e-36115
myeloid cell3.57e-33108
common myeloid progenitor3.57e-33108
myeloid leukocyte1.32e-2172
nucleate cell1.90e-2155
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.92e-2152
lymphocyte9.47e-2153
common lymphoid progenitor9.47e-2153
classical monocyte1.88e-1842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.88e-1842
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.92e-1866
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.19e-1667
T cell6.42e-1625
pro-T cell6.42e-1625
defensive cell1.00e-1448
phagocyte1.00e-1448
mature alpha-beta T cell6.79e-1418
alpha-beta T cell6.79e-1418
immature T cell6.79e-1418
mature T cell6.79e-1418
immature alpha-beta T cell6.79e-1418
monopoietic cell7.50e-1459
monocyte7.50e-1459
monoblast7.50e-1459
promonocyte7.50e-1459
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.74e-1361
connective tissue cell1.63e-09361
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.27e-0911
mesenchymal cell5.88e-09354
B cell1.80e-0714
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.99e-2498
blood island1.99e-2498
hemolymphoid system3.66e-21108
bone marrow2.67e-1376
immune system3.24e-1393
bone element5.74e-1282
blood1.10e-1115
haemolymphatic fluid1.10e-1115
organism substance1.10e-1115
skeletal element1.95e-1190
skeletal system8.20e-09100
connective tissue1.27e-08371
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
leukemia1.55e-1439
myeloid leukemia5.79e-1231
hematologic cancer6.24e-1151
immune system cancer6.24e-1151


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.045739507768101



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.