Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3967

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:28, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3967_Neutrophils_CD19_Eosinophils_Macrophage_CD14_Monocytederived_Basophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:31230650..31230683,-p2@LAPTM5
Hg19::chr1:31230687..31230701,-p3@LAPTM5
Hg19::chr4:80994619..80994633,-p6@ANTXR2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0031090organelle membrane0.0376431503972593
GO:0005765lysosomal membrane0.0376431503972593
GO:0005774vacuolar membrane0.0376431503972593
GO:0044437vacuolar part0.0376431503972593



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.12e-83168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.12e-83168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.57e-79161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.57e-79161
hematopoietic cell8.66e-79177
leukocyte7.63e-71136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell9.16e-60120
nongranular leukocyte4.03e-57115
myeloid cell6.50e-52108
common myeloid progenitor6.50e-52108
myeloid leukocyte7.15e-4072
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.65e-3567
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.21e-3466
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.73e-3161
monopoietic cell7.32e-3159
monocyte7.32e-3159
monoblast7.32e-3159
promonocyte7.32e-3159
defensive cell5.34e-2748
phagocyte5.34e-2748
nucleate cell2.66e-2355
classical monocyte5.83e-2342
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.83e-2342
lymphocyte6.24e-2353
common lymphoid progenitor6.24e-2353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.62e-2252
lymphocyte of B lineage6.12e-1424
pro-B cell6.12e-1424
mesenchymal cell3.13e-13354
connective tissue cell8.86e-12361
T cell6.02e-0925
pro-T cell6.02e-0925
B cell1.45e-0814
motile cell5.31e-08386
mature alpha-beta T cell1.75e-0718
alpha-beta T cell1.75e-0718
immature T cell1.75e-0718
mature T cell1.75e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell1.75e-0718
granulocyte9.99e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system7.08e-3998
blood island7.08e-3998
hemolymphoid system1.13e-38108
immune system4.74e-3293
bone marrow3.67e-2976
bone element1.87e-2582
skeletal element1.17e-2190
skeletal system2.96e-18100
adult organism1.86e-13114
lateral plate mesoderm5.45e-11203
connective tissue5.86e-11371
blood3.00e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid3.00e-0715
organism substance3.00e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer1.86e-1651
immune system cancer1.86e-1651
leukemia2.66e-1339
myeloid leukemia1.57e-1131


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0462752868430188
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109134034806282



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.