Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3675

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:32, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3675_Mast_Whole_blood_acute_NK_Neutrophils_CD34



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:72733350..72733373,+p2@RAB37
Hg19::chr17:72733377..72733403,+p1@RAB37
Hg19::chr17:73839792..73839918,-p4@UNC13D


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.99e-60172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.99e-60172
hematopoietic cell1.64e-57182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.56e-56165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.56e-56165
leukocyte2.28e-42140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.23e-35124
nongranular leukocyte7.83e-34119
myeloid cell4.17e-33112
common myeloid progenitor4.17e-33112
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.46e-2052
lymphocyte2.37e-2053
common lymphoid progenitor2.37e-2053
myeloid leukocyte2.53e-1976
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.61e-1670
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.60e-1571
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.99e-1542
T cell7.01e-1525
pro-T cell7.01e-1525
classical monocyte8.39e-1545
monopoietic cell1.55e-1263
monocyte1.55e-1263
monoblast1.55e-1263
promonocyte1.55e-1263
mature alpha-beta T cell3.44e-1218
alpha-beta T cell3.44e-1218
immature T cell3.44e-1218
mature T cell3.44e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell3.44e-1218
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.01e-1265
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.21e-0811
B cell3.67e-0714
connective tissue cell9.71e-07365
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.70e-21102
blood island1.70e-21102
hemolymphoid system4.10e-18112
immune system4.07e-12115
bone marrow8.76e-1280
blood2.91e-1015
haemolymphatic fluid2.91e-1015
organism substance2.91e-1015
bone element3.96e-1086
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
leukemia5.15e-1739
myeloid leukemia2.99e-1431
hematologic cancer3.50e-1451
immune system cancer3.50e-1451


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.045739507768101



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.