Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4846

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:18, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4846_amniotic_astrocytoma_Gingival_cervical_Smooth_Mallassezderived_Mammary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chrX:114827818..114827842,+p4@PLS3
Hg19::chrX:114827851..114827872,+p2@PLS3
Hg19::chrX:114827882..114827906,+p3@PLS3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.20e-2283
vessel1.16e-2168
vasculature1.45e-2178
vascular system1.45e-2178
epithelial tube open at both ends4.37e-2159
blood vessel4.37e-2159
blood vasculature4.37e-2159
vascular cord4.37e-2159
artery4.66e-1842
arterial blood vessel4.66e-1842
arterial system4.66e-1842
systemic artery1.07e-1433
systemic arterial system1.07e-1433
surface structure2.25e-1499
circulatory system8.11e-14112
cardiovascular system9.38e-14109
unilaminar epithelium6.13e-13148
epithelial tube1.82e-12117
multi-cellular organism3.94e-12656
multilaminar epithelium1.34e-1183
cell layer1.96e-11309
anatomical conduit2.23e-11240
epithelium5.13e-11306
anatomical system5.19e-11624
anatomical group8.80e-11625
organism subdivision1.04e-10264
somite1.24e-1071
presomitic mesoderm1.24e-1071
presumptive segmental plate1.24e-1071
dermomyotome1.24e-1071
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.24e-1071
paraxial mesoderm1.78e-1072
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.78e-1072
aorta2.12e-1021
aortic system2.12e-1021
dense mesenchyme tissue3.10e-1073
skeletal muscle tissue1.94e-0962
striated muscle tissue1.94e-0962
myotome1.94e-0962
muscle tissue3.12e-0964
musculature3.12e-0964
musculature of body3.12e-0964
epithelial vesicle3.76e-0978
organ component layer3.84e-0866
anatomical cluster8.16e-08373
blood vessel endothelium1.36e-0718
endothelium1.36e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium1.36e-0718
integument1.47e-0746
integumental system1.47e-0746
trunk mesenchyme2.11e-07122
multi-tissue structure2.23e-07342
embryonic structure2.32e-07564
trunk7.36e-07199
skin of body7.38e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00902830833986097



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.