Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3645

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:15, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3645_ductus_seminal_alveolar_endometrial_Smooth_small_nonsmall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:46675539..46675551,-p7@HOXB6
Hg19::chr17:46675558..46675577,-p2@HOXB6
Hg19::chr17:46675586..46675600,-p6@HOXB6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cavitated compound organ1.89e-1831
trunk3.85e-18199
mesenchyme4.74e-18160
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.74e-18160
kidney1.01e-1526
kidney mesenchyme1.01e-1526
upper urinary tract1.01e-1526
kidney rudiment1.01e-1526
kidney field1.01e-1526
excretory tube1.32e-1416
kidney epithelium1.32e-1416
nephron epithelium1.13e-1315
renal tubule1.13e-1315
nephron tubule1.13e-1315
nephron1.13e-1315
uriniferous tubule1.13e-1315
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.13e-1315
parenchyma2.15e-1215
cortex of kidney6.34e-1212
renal parenchyma6.34e-1212
renal system7.07e-1248
subdivision of trunk1.45e-11112
abdominal segment of trunk1.65e-1160
abdomen1.65e-1160
trunk mesenchyme1.87e-11122
urinary system structure2.02e-1147
epithelial vesicle1.71e-1078
abdomen element2.61e-1054
abdominal segment element2.61e-1054
duct2.76e-1019
cortex9.34e-1015
mesonephros1.39e-099
pronephros1.39e-099
nephrogenic cord1.39e-099
pronephric mesoderm1.39e-099
rostral part of nephrogenic cord1.39e-099
presumptive pronephric mesoderm1.39e-099
organism subdivision1.46e-09264
nephron tubule epithelium3.10e-0910
trunk region element5.57e-09101
intraembryonic coelom6.39e-0912
epithelial tube7.78e-09117
mesonephric epithelium1.45e-088
mesonephric tubule1.45e-088
nephric duct1.45e-088
renal duct1.45e-088
mesonephric duct1.45e-088
pronephric duct1.45e-088
vessel4.61e-0868
unilaminar epithelium8.25e-08148
primitive nephron1.24e-077
renal glomerulus1.24e-077
renal corpuscle1.24e-077
glomerular capsule1.24e-077
metanephric mesenchyme1.24e-077
glomerular tuft1.24e-077
S-shaped body1.24e-077
renal vesicle1.24e-077
comma-shaped body1.24e-077
urogenital ridge2.98e-0711
somite5.59e-0771
presomitic mesoderm5.59e-0771
presumptive segmental plate5.59e-0771
dermomyotome5.59e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.59e-0771
paraxial mesoderm9.69e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.69e-0772


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324909677052739
SUZ12#23512350.11578091106297.93834897779404e-060.000222033537464336
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00196950524101374



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.