Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C723

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:45, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C723_CD14_CD4_Eosinophils_CD8_Natural_Neutrophils_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:43633914..43633935,+p2@CSGALNACT2
Hg19::chr11:82868158..82868179,+p2@PCF11
Hg19::chr16:21513575..21513614,-p1@LOC100271836
Hg19::chr16:30346739..30346761,-p1@LOC595101
Hg19::chr17:18218587..18218624,+p1@SMCR8
Hg19::chr18:76829385..76829438,+p1@ATP9B
Hg19::chr2:201729366..201729392,-p1@CLK1
Hg19::chr5:65440032..65440099,+p2@SREK1
Hg19::chr7:120590822..120590857,+p1@ING3
Hg19::chrX:73834345..73834364,-p4@RLIM
Hg19::chrX:73834386..73834435,-p2@RLIM


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005849mRNA cleavage factor complex0.0280344945489482
GO:0015917aminophospholipid transport0.0280344945489482
GO:0006379mRNA cleavage0.04982443207512



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell1.08e-51172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.08e-51172
leukocyte1.17e-50140
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.03e-47165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.03e-47165
hematopoietic cell1.10e-45182
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell6.85e-42124
nongranular leukocyte6.53e-39119
myeloid cell7.73e-32112
common myeloid progenitor7.73e-32112
myeloid leukocyte1.15e-3076
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.92e-2771
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.10e-2670
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.39e-2642
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.34e-2465
classical monocyte6.51e-2445
monopoietic cell3.69e-2363
monocyte3.69e-2363
monoblast3.69e-2363
promonocyte3.69e-2363
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.75e-1452
lymphocyte8.70e-1453
common lymphoid progenitor8.70e-1453
mature alpha-beta T cell2.04e-0918
alpha-beta T cell2.04e-0918
immature T cell2.04e-0918
mature T cell2.04e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell2.04e-0918
T cell1.28e-0825
pro-T cell1.28e-0825
mesenchymal cell1.33e-08358
connective tissue cell1.80e-07365
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.17e-30102
blood island3.17e-30102
hemolymphoid system5.68e-28112
bone marrow8.09e-2380
bone element7.79e-2286
adult organism9.34e-20115
immune system7.39e-17115
skeletal element7.56e-16101
skeletal system7.56e-16101
neural tube1.96e-0757
neural rod1.96e-0757
future spinal cord1.96e-0757
neural keel1.96e-0757
connective tissue4.55e-07375


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.