Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1606

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:09, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:98300255..98300322,-p1@1810046J19Rik
Mm9::chr13:19487597..19487658,-p1@Stard3nl
Mm9::chr14:30781555..30781648,+p1@Selk
Mm9::chr4:41670161..41670211,-p1@Dctn3
Mm9::chr7:31016741..31016809,-p1@Tbcb


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008430selenium binding0.00169741218953969
GO:0007017microtubule-based process0.0276633551032979
GO:0005869dynactin complex0.0361631995205185
GO:0015630microtubule cytoskeleton0.0361631995205185



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system5.18e-2775
central nervous system4.27e-2673
regional part of nervous system2.00e-2154
ectoderm-derived structure4.68e-2195
ectoderm4.68e-2195
presumptive ectoderm4.68e-2195
neural tube1.87e-2052
neural rod1.87e-2052
future spinal cord1.87e-2052
neural keel1.87e-2052
neurectoderm8.12e-1964
neural plate8.12e-1964
presumptive neural plate8.12e-1964
brain2.08e-1747
future brain2.08e-1747
regional part of brain3.41e-1746
gray matter1.49e-1634
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.76e-1592
ecto-epithelium5.87e-1573
anterior neural tube9.52e-1540
regional part of forebrain1.97e-1439
forebrain1.97e-1439
future forebrain1.97e-1439
brain grey matter8.48e-1429
regional part of telencephalon8.48e-1429
telencephalon8.48e-1429
pre-chordal neural plate2.82e-1349
cerebral cortex8.15e-1021
cerebral hemisphere8.15e-1021
pallium8.15e-1021
regional part of cerebral cortex4.96e-0817


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}