Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2347

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:19, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:38194778..38194798,+p3@Lhx2
Mm9::chr2:38206580..38206600,+p2@Lhx2
Mm9::chr2:38206744..38206766,+p1@Lhx2
Mm9::chr2:38210314..38210324,+p@chr2:38210314..38210324
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)2.85e-0823
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)2.85e-0823

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
pre-chordal neural plate2.18e-2349
ecto-epithelium6.04e-2073
ectoderm-derived structure9.79e-2095
ectoderm9.79e-2095
presumptive ectoderm9.79e-2095
neurectoderm2.21e-1964
neural plate2.21e-1964
presumptive neural plate2.21e-1964
anterior neural tube1.60e-1840
regional part of forebrain4.16e-1839
forebrain4.16e-1839
future forebrain4.16e-1839
brain4.05e-1747
future brain4.05e-1747
regional part of nervous system8.34e-1754
regional part of brain1.01e-1646
brain grey matter4.66e-1629
regional part of telencephalon4.66e-1629
telencephalon4.66e-1629
neural tube8.60e-1652
neural rod8.60e-1652
future spinal cord8.60e-1652
neural keel8.60e-1652
gray matter5.84e-1534
central nervous system6.93e-1573
nervous system5.76e-1475
cerebral cortex6.83e-1421
cerebral hemisphere6.83e-1421
pallium6.83e-1421
regional part of cerebral cortex5.09e-1117
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.60e-1092
occipital lobe5.24e-0710
visual cortex5.24e-0710
neocortex5.24e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}