Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2365

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:21, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr3:143865264..143865309,-p3@Lmo4
Mm9::chr3:143865314..143865331,-p5@Lmo4
Mm9::chr3:143868129..143868172,-p1@Lmo4
Mm9::chr3:143868471..143868494,-p2@Lmo4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell3.12e-1349
ectodermal cell3.17e-1144
neurectodermal cell3.17e-1144
neural cell8.06e-1143
electrically responsive cell6.43e-0939
electrically active cell6.43e-0939
neuron9.74e-0733
neuronal stem cell9.74e-0733
neuroblast9.74e-0733
electrically signaling cell9.74e-0733

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure2.50e-2595
ectoderm2.50e-2595
presumptive ectoderm2.50e-2595
nervous system8.48e-2275
central nervous system4.54e-2173
ecto-epithelium5.43e-1873
neurectoderm1.14e-1464
neural plate1.14e-1464
presumptive neural plate1.14e-1464
pre-chordal neural plate7.22e-1349
regional part of nervous system1.15e-1254
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.61e-1292
regional part of forebrain1.63e-1239
forebrain1.63e-1239
future forebrain1.63e-1239
anterior neural tube1.90e-1240
neural tube2.13e-1252
neural rod2.13e-1252
future spinal cord2.13e-1252
neural keel2.13e-1252
brain1.51e-1147
future brain1.51e-1147
regional part of brain2.52e-1146
regional part of cerebral cortex4.95e-1117
gray matter5.20e-1034
brain grey matter8.40e-0929
regional part of telencephalon8.40e-0929
telencephalon8.40e-0929
cerebral cortex8.91e-0921
cerebral hemisphere8.91e-0921
pallium8.91e-0921
occipital lobe4.07e-0810
visual cortex4.07e-0810
neocortex4.07e-0810
peripheral nervous system4.33e-0711


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}