Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3233

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:44, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:138156944..138157016,-p@chr1:138156944..138157016
-
Mm9::chr8:74249549..74249583,-p2@Fcho1
Mm9::chr8:74249595..74249635,-p3@Fcho1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)4.57e-1123
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)4.57e-1123
neuron1.72e-0733
neuronal stem cell1.72e-0733
neuroblast1.72e-0733
electrically signaling cell1.72e-0733

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system1.41e-1854
neural tube1.18e-1752
neural rod1.18e-1752
future spinal cord1.18e-1752
neural keel1.18e-1752
central nervous system3.51e-1673
neurectoderm4.53e-1664
neural plate4.53e-1664
presumptive neural plate4.53e-1664
gray matter9.34e-1634
brain2.21e-1547
future brain2.21e-1547
regional part of brain8.45e-1546
nervous system1.05e-1475
anterior neural tube1.32e-1440
ecto-epithelium1.93e-1473
regional part of forebrain4.21e-1439
forebrain4.21e-1439
future forebrain4.21e-1439
pre-chordal neural plate6.29e-1449
brain grey matter2.32e-1329
regional part of telencephalon2.32e-1329
telencephalon2.32e-1329
ectoderm-derived structure3.47e-1295
ectoderm3.47e-1295
presumptive ectoderm3.47e-1295
cerebral cortex2.89e-0921
cerebral hemisphere2.89e-0921
pallium2.89e-0921
regional part of cerebral cortex9.98e-0817
occipital lobe2.20e-0710
visual cortex2.20e-0710
neocortex2.20e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}