Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1107

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:24, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr12:86337259..86337369,+p1@Ylpm1
Mm9::chr14:75684150..75684197,+p1@Zc3h13
Mm9::chr15:12047568..12047601,+p2@Zfr
Mm9::chr1:129999889..129999937,+p1@R3hdm1
Mm9::chr2:44782726..44782759,-p1@Gtdc1
Mm9::chr2:73730676..73730692,-p1@Atf2
p1@LOC100047997
Mm9::chr7:105805040..105805110,-p1@2210018M11Rik


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectoderm9.18e-1364
neural plate9.18e-1364
presumptive neural plate9.18e-1364
regional part of nervous system5.96e-1254
pre-chordal neural plate6.88e-1249
ecto-epithelium2.03e-1173
neural tube5.36e-1152
neural rod5.36e-1152
future spinal cord5.36e-1152
neural keel5.36e-1152
brain6.61e-1147
future brain6.61e-1147
central nervous system1.25e-1073
ectoderm-derived structure2.14e-1095
ectoderm2.14e-1095
presumptive ectoderm2.14e-1095
regional part of brain2.54e-1046
anterior neural tube3.84e-1040
nervous system1.18e-0975
regional part of forebrain1.29e-0939
forebrain1.29e-0939
future forebrain1.29e-0939
gray matter1.34e-0934
brain grey matter1.59e-0929
regional part of telencephalon1.59e-0929
telencephalon1.59e-0929
cerebral cortex5.70e-0821
cerebral hemisphere5.70e-0821
pallium5.70e-0821
occipital lobe6.32e-0810
visual cortex6.32e-0810
neocortex6.32e-0810
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.59e-0792


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}