Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2113

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:55, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:60996544..60996579,+p@chr14:60996544..60996579
+
Mm9::chr14:61005354..61005357,+p@chr14:61005354..61005357
+
Mm9::chr6:114256296..114256300,+p@chr6:114256296..114256300
+
Mm9::chr6:114256857..114256861,+p@chr6:114256857..114256861
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)2.51e-1523
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)2.51e-1523
neuron4.79e-0933
neuronal stem cell4.79e-0933
neuroblast4.79e-0933
electrically signaling cell4.79e-0933

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectoderm6.94e-3164
neural plate6.94e-3164
presumptive neural plate6.94e-3164
regional part of nervous system3.92e-2954
neural tube2.03e-2752
neural rod2.03e-2752
future spinal cord2.03e-2752
neural keel2.03e-2752
pre-chordal neural plate3.70e-2649
ecto-epithelium1.76e-2573
nervous system2.08e-2475
ectoderm-derived structure3.80e-2495
ectoderm3.80e-2495
presumptive ectoderm3.80e-2495
central nervous system6.68e-2473
brain1.34e-2347
future brain1.34e-2347
regional part of brain1.11e-2246
anterior neural tube1.56e-2040
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.60e-2092
regional part of forebrain1.34e-1939
forebrain1.34e-1939
future forebrain1.34e-1939
gray matter2.17e-1834
brain grey matter7.58e-1529
regional part of telencephalon7.58e-1529
telencephalon7.58e-1529
cerebral cortex2.05e-1021
cerebral hemisphere2.05e-1021
pallium2.05e-1021
regional part of cerebral cortex2.96e-0817
posterior neural tube2.36e-0712
chordal neural plate2.36e-0712


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}