Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3205

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:34, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr19:54119723..54119734,+p2@Adra2a
Mm9::chr19:54119741..54119757,+p1@Adra2a
Mm9::chr19:54120078..54120093,+p6@Adra2a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)1.20e-0923
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)1.20e-0923

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube4.65e-1852
neural rod4.65e-1852
future spinal cord4.65e-1852
neural keel4.65e-1852
regional part of nervous system1.34e-1754
central nervous system2.84e-1673
gray matter3.84e-1634
neurectoderm1.97e-1564
neural plate1.97e-1564
presumptive neural plate1.97e-1564
nervous system2.73e-1575
brain5.93e-1447
future brain5.93e-1447
regional part of brain1.80e-1346
ecto-epithelium2.21e-1273
brain grey matter4.26e-1229
regional part of telencephalon4.26e-1229
telencephalon4.26e-1229
anterior neural tube4.48e-1240
ectoderm-derived structure6.85e-1295
ectoderm6.85e-1295
presumptive ectoderm6.85e-1295
regional part of forebrain2.17e-1139
forebrain2.17e-1139
future forebrain2.17e-1139
pre-chordal neural plate2.47e-1149
cerebral cortex8.95e-0821
cerebral hemisphere8.95e-0821
pallium8.95e-0821
regional part of cerebral cortex1.16e-0717
posterior neural tube4.67e-0712
chordal neural plate4.67e-0712


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}