Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2840

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:29, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2840_retinoblastoma_embryonic_carcinoid_medulloblastoma_argyrophil_merkel_neuroblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:119399805..119399860,-p1@FAM184A
Hg19::chr6:119399865..119399887,-p4@FAM184A
Hg19::chr6:119399895..119399915,-p3@FAM184A
Hg19::chr6:119399919..119399944,-p2@FAM184A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.05e-37115
regional part of nervous system2.81e-3594
nervous system2.81e-3594
central nervous system1.23e-3282
neural tube3.64e-3057
neural rod3.64e-3057
future spinal cord3.64e-3057
neural keel3.64e-3057
brain2.32e-2669
future brain2.32e-2669
neurectoderm1.48e-2590
neural plate2.32e-2586
presumptive neural plate2.32e-2586
anterior neural tube9.08e-2542
regional part of forebrain9.92e-2541
forebrain9.92e-2541
future forebrain9.92e-2541
regional part of brain3.74e-2459
gray matter1.69e-2034
brain grey matter1.69e-2034
telencephalon2.39e-2034
pre-chordal neural plate4.28e-2061
ectoderm5.15e-20173
presumptive ectoderm5.15e-20173
regional part of telencephalon1.01e-1933
ectoderm-derived structure1.42e-19169
cerebral hemisphere1.43e-1932
anterior region of body3.04e-17129
craniocervical region3.04e-17129
head1.05e-16123
cerebral cortex1.79e-1525
pallium1.79e-1525
regional part of cerebral cortex9.03e-1522
neocortex1.52e-1320
posterior neural tube9.69e-0715
chordal neural plate9.69e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.