Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2838

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2838_occipital_medial_squamous_gastric_parietal_frontal_Melanocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:117739710..117739729,-p@chr6:117739710..117739729
-
Hg19::chr7:116312570..116312577,+p11@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312581..116312589,+p12@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312598..116312603,+p15@MET


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.06e-11253
endo-epithelial cell4.41e-0842
endodermal cell2.59e-0758
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
telencephalon5.27e-1434
regional part of cerebral cortex3.76e-1322
cerebral cortex5.12e-1325
pallium5.12e-1325
regional part of forebrain6.53e-1341
forebrain6.53e-1341
anterior neural tube6.53e-1341
future forebrain6.53e-1341
cerebral hemisphere6.61e-1332
regional part of telencephalon1.06e-1232
brain grey matter2.12e-1234
gray matter2.12e-1234
neocortex1.63e-1120
pre-chordal neural plate3.28e-1061
organ system subdivision6.23e-10223
regional part of nervous system1.70e-0953
regional part of brain1.70e-0953
neural tube4.10e-0956
neural rod4.10e-0956
future spinal cord4.10e-0956
neural keel4.10e-0956
brain2.19e-0868
future brain2.19e-0868
multi-tissue structure5.35e-08342
ecto-epithelium1.40e-07104
ectoderm-derived structure1.62e-07171
ectoderm1.62e-07171
presumptive ectoderm1.62e-07171
central nervous system1.92e-0781
nervous system4.11e-0789
neural plate5.82e-0782
presumptive neural plate5.82e-0782
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma9.31e-12106
cell type cancer5.45e-11143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.16.84463
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.12.26728
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.11.91637
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.12.03364
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.257871
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.01696
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.12.59564
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.03616
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.253219
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.21.85039
MA0079.21.11128
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BHLHE40#8553333.65386016023314.35025573591721e-050.000775318018435934
FOS#235336.74846648167080.005032452776317940.0234751143644588
JUND#372735.245997956403270.01043432751748420.0387164078444784
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466459387414852
MXI1#460137.471178721569470.003741314738550960.0186430254296256
NR3C1#2908311.22976749837980.001131672068063850.0077563131064786
TCF7L2#693438.077632422353010.002978381685834620.0158711773502159
TFAP2A#7020312.38897577978370.000846941303588430.00638240153008673
TFAP2C#702238.106921457395170.002947011739866440.0157200551151699
USF1#739134.771124457905970.01370465887188020.0483351637147201
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.0107263106990676



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.