Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2843

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 09:39, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2843_CD4_cholangiocellular_seminal_ductus_Mesenchymal_caudate_Fibroblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr6:136172724..136172738,+ p6@PDE7B
Hg19::chr6:136172786..136172816,+ p4@PDE7B
Hg19::chr6:136172820..136172846,+ p2@PDE7B
Hg19::chr6:136173008..136173013,+ p1@PDE7B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.88e-17115
musculoskeletal system3.98e-14167
regional part of brain9.30e-1459
neural tube9.71e-1357
neural rod9.71e-1357
future spinal cord9.71e-1357
neural keel9.71e-1357
neural plate4.79e-1286
presumptive neural plate4.79e-1286
neurectoderm5.64e-1290
regional part of forebrain5.73e-1241
forebrain5.73e-1241
future forebrain5.73e-1241
anterior neural tube7.03e-1242
somite8.32e-1283
paraxial mesoderm8.32e-1283
presomitic mesoderm8.32e-1283
presumptive segmental plate8.32e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm8.32e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.32e-1283
brain1.02e-1169
future brain1.02e-1169
pre-chordal neural plate1.72e-1161
anterior region of body2.37e-11129
craniocervical region2.37e-11129
gray matter8.41e-1134
brain grey matter8.41e-1134
cerebral hemisphere1.15e-1032
telencephalon1.52e-1034
head2.20e-10123
dermomyotome3.07e-1070
muscle tissue3.52e-1063
musculature3.52e-1063
musculature of body3.52e-1063
regional part of telencephalon4.60e-1033
central nervous system6.00e-1082
skeletal muscle tissue1.17e-0961
striated muscle tissue1.17e-0961
myotome1.17e-0961
regional part of cerebral cortex7.25e-0922
neocortex1.26e-0820
multi-tissue structure7.53e-08347
regional part of nervous system1.28e-0794
nervous system1.28e-0794
cerebral cortex3.13e-0725
pallium3.13e-0725
anatomical cluster7.10e-07286


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.