Coexpression cluster:C689

Full id: C689_Alveolar_mesothelioma_Retinal_Mesothelial_Prostate_bile_Tracheal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:67232723..67232762,-	p2@TMEM134
Hg19::chr12:52627019..52627037,+	p1@KRT7
Hg19::chr12:52628993..52629014,+	p@chr12:52628993..52629014 +
Hg19::chr12:52629037..52629072,+	p@chr12:52629037..52629072 +
Hg19::chr12:52629080..52629112,+	p@chr12:52629080..52629112 +
Hg19::chr12:52629130..52629159,-	p@chr12:52629130..52629159 -
Hg19::chr12:52635300..52635325,+	p9@KRT7
Hg19::chr12:52636796..52636807,+	p26@KRT7
Hg19::chr12:52636827..52636840,+	p3@KRT7
Hg19::chr12:52639223..52639262,+	p6@KRT7
Hg19::chr12:52642466..52642508,+	p@chr12:52642466..52642508 +
Hg19::chr12:52642530..52642567,+	p@chr12:52642530..52642567 +

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	3.84e-45	254
squamous epithelial cell	5.84e-14	62
embryonic cell	8.44e-14	248
lining cell	2.12e-12	57
barrier cell	2.12e-12	57
mesothelial cell	1.68e-09	19
endo-epithelial cell	8.84e-09	43
mesodermal cell	3.87e-08	119
meso-epithelial cell	1.91e-07	44
respiratory epithelial cell	3.45e-07	13
endodermal cell	3.97e-07	59

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
primordium	1.37e-18	168
endoderm-derived structure	2.97e-18	169
endoderm	2.97e-18	169
presumptive endoderm	2.97e-18	169
immaterial anatomical entity	4.27e-16	126
anatomical space	9.67e-16	104
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure	1.28e-15	130
mesenchyme	6.27e-14	238
entire embryonic mesenchyme	6.27e-14	238
digestive system	2.45e-13	155
digestive tract	2.45e-13	155
primitive gut	2.45e-13	155
subdivision of digestive tract	4.27e-12	129
endodermal part of digestive tract	4.27e-12	129
foregut	4.34e-12	98
respiratory tract	6.44e-11	53
trunk	1.16e-10	216
anatomical cavity	1.42e-10	70
respiratory system	2.01e-10	72
subdivision of trunk	3.28e-10	113
respiratory primordium	6.91e-10	38
endoderm of foregut	6.91e-10	38
anatomical cluster	8.13e-10	286
multi-tissue structure	8.22e-10	347
epithelial tube	2.12e-09	118
body cavity precursor	2.63e-09	63
multi-cellular organism	2.86e-09	659
endo-epithelium	5.08e-09	82
cell layer	6.30e-09	312
epithelium	9.03e-09	309
trunk region element	1.04e-08	107
intermediate mesoderm	1.24e-08	37
organ segment	1.66e-08	97
segment of respiratory tract	2.47e-08	46
duct	4.40e-08	26
anatomical system	4.97e-08	625
anatomical group	7.80e-08	626
organ part	1.20e-07	219
extraembryonic membrane	2.12e-07	14
membranous layer	2.12e-07	14
epithelial bud	2.76e-07	37
thoracic segment of trunk	3.34e-07	52
renal system	3.36e-07	45
mesoderm	4.49e-07	448
mesoderm-derived structure	4.49e-07	448
presumptive mesoderm	4.49e-07	448
urinary system structure	4.76e-07	44
ectodermal placode	6.73e-07	29
larynx	7.22e-07	9
unilaminar epithelium	7.76e-07	138
urogenital ridge	9.17e-07	20

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
carcinoma	9.69e-09	106

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.