Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2896: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C2896_Mallassezderived_Mammary_Keratinocyte_mesodermal_Sebocyte_Gingival_Tracheal

Latest revision as of 12:15, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2896_Mallassezderived_Mammary_Keratinocyte_mesodermal_Sebocyte_Gingival_Tracheal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:40855224..40855239,+p@chr7:40855224..40855239
+
Hg19::chr7:40855246..40855275,+p@chr7:40855246..40855275
+
Hg19::chr7:40855279..40855286,+p@chr7:40855279..40855286
+
Hg19::chr7:40855299..40855321,+p@chr7:40855299..40855321
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
somatic cell1.76e-27588
fibroblast1.46e-2376
animal cell2.89e-22679
eukaryotic cell2.89e-22679
muscle precursor cell3.23e-2058
myoblast3.23e-2058
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell3.23e-2058
muscle cell1.66e-1955
contractile cell1.58e-1859
smooth muscle cell2.06e-1843
smooth muscle myoblast2.06e-1843
embryonic cell1.56e-17250
electrically responsive cell1.35e-1661
electrically active cell1.35e-1661
vascular associated smooth muscle cell2.26e-1632
native cell8.66e-16722
non-terminally differentiated cell1.74e-11106
mesodermal cell2.29e-10121
general ecto-epithelial cell5.99e-1014
skin fibroblast4.84e-0923
somatic stem cell5.66e-09433
aortic smooth muscle cell3.53e-0810
respiratory epithelial cell4.04e-0813
stem cell4.60e-08441
multi fate stem cell6.72e-08427
ecto-epithelial cell4.67e-0734
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium1.05e-2683
surface structure2.61e-2399
somite1.60e-2271
presomitic mesoderm1.60e-2271
presumptive segmental plate1.60e-2271
dermomyotome1.60e-2271
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.60e-2271
dense mesenchyme tissue1.68e-2273
paraxial mesoderm6.61e-2272
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.61e-2272
epithelial vesicle9.11e-2178
skeletal muscle tissue9.61e-1862
striated muscle tissue9.61e-1862
myotome9.61e-1862
muscle tissue1.23e-1664
musculature1.23e-1664
musculature of body1.23e-1664
organism subdivision6.16e-14264
integument2.81e-1346
integumental system2.81e-1346
artery5.42e-1342
arterial blood vessel5.42e-1342
arterial system5.42e-1342
skin of body2.89e-1241
mesenchyme3.32e-11160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.32e-11160
trunk mesenchyme5.75e-11122
systemic artery8.16e-1133
systemic arterial system8.16e-1133
trunk1.57e-09199
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.20e-0983
unilaminar epithelium5.65e-09148
subdivision of skeletal system9.63e-0916
blood vessel smooth muscle3.53e-0810
arterial system smooth muscle3.53e-0810
artery smooth muscle tissue3.53e-0810
aorta smooth muscle tissue3.53e-0810
epithelial tube open at both ends6.02e-0859
blood vessel6.02e-0859
blood vasculature6.02e-0859
vascular cord6.02e-0859
cell layer9.18e-08309
axial skeletal system1.08e-0714
epithelium1.37e-07306
gingiva1.98e-078
smooth muscle tissue2.01e-0715
cranial skeletal system3.32e-0711
head4.87e-0756
mouth6.60e-0729
stomodeum6.60e-0729


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0214529
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.11.41335
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.28333
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.11.92841
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.16.32176
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.11.13665
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.777367
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.21.65877
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.533581
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.000248021
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.