Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2999: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.235978595633694,0

Latest revision as of 12:17, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2999_renal_Cardiac_CD14_Chondrocyte_Myoblast_Fibroblast_Endothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:17279356..17279382,+p@chr10:17279356..17279382
+
Hg19::chr10:17279385..17279425,+p@chr10:17279385..17279425
+
Hg19::chr10:17279533..17279566,+p@chr10:17279533..17279566
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
multi fate stem cell1.36e-17427
defensive cell1.69e-1648
phagocyte1.69e-1648
somatic stem cell2.03e-16433
somatic cell9.00e-16588
stem cell2.07e-15441
classical monocyte2.18e-1542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.18e-1542
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.19e-1561
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell6.48e-1567
monopoietic cell1.97e-1459
monocyte1.97e-1459
monoblast1.97e-1459
promonocyte1.97e-1459
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.28e-1366
fibroblast2.47e-1376
stuff accumulating cell5.14e-1387
myeloid leukocyte4.12e-1272
non-terminally differentiated cell4.69e-10106
muscle precursor cell5.39e-1058
myoblast5.39e-1058
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell5.39e-1058
mesodermal cell1.23e-09121
muscle cell2.13e-0955
electrically responsive cell4.88e-0961
electrically active cell4.88e-0961
contractile cell1.19e-0859
connective tissue cell1.24e-08361
skin fibroblast2.23e-0823
mesenchymal cell9.04e-08354
motile cell9.62e-08386
smooth muscle cell1.48e-0743
smooth muscle myoblast1.48e-0743
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
musculoskeletal system3.15e-25167
mesoderm4.85e-23315
mesoderm-derived structure4.85e-23315
presumptive mesoderm4.85e-23315
lateral plate mesoderm6.83e-18203
skeletal system1.06e-14100
bone marrow1.54e-1476
skeletal element8.63e-1490
bone element9.52e-1482
immune system1.83e-1393
hemolymphoid system3.50e-12108
vasculature8.44e-1278
vascular system8.44e-1278
dense mesenchyme tissue1.81e-1173
cardiovascular system2.19e-11109
somite2.26e-1171
presomitic mesoderm2.26e-1171
presumptive segmental plate2.26e-1171
dermomyotome2.26e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.26e-1171
hematopoietic system3.27e-1198
blood island3.27e-1198
circulatory system4.35e-11112
paraxial mesoderm4.37e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.37e-1172
epithelial vesicle1.87e-1078
vessel4.83e-1068
skeletal muscle tissue1.22e-0962
striated muscle tissue1.22e-0962
myotome1.22e-0962
connective tissue2.15e-09371
muscle tissue4.23e-0964
musculature4.23e-0964
musculature of body4.23e-0964
artery4.46e-0942
arterial blood vessel4.46e-0942
arterial system4.46e-0942
epithelial tube open at both ends7.39e-0959
blood vessel7.39e-0959
blood vasculature7.39e-0959
vascular cord7.39e-0959
multilaminar epithelium7.69e-0983
systemic artery1.10e-0733
systemic arterial system1.10e-0733
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.30e-0783
anatomical system2.14e-07624
anatomical group2.25e-07625
multi-cellular organism3.12e-07656


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.13.42881
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.12.84752
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.0526989
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.00160703
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0278125994195953
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.027525278195673
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0245320551423158



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.