Coexpression cluster:C2914

Full id: C2914_CD14_breast_small_spinal_osteosarcoma_skin_Macrophage

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:116681150..116681164,-	p5@TRPS1
Hg19::chr8:116681194..116681214,-	p1@TRPS1
Hg19::chr8:116681221..116681236,-	p3@TRPS1
Hg19::chr8:116681247..116681261,-	p8@TRPS1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor	8.57e-23	65
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte	8.65e-23	42
monopoietic cell	7.80e-22	63
monocyte	7.80e-22	63
monoblast	7.80e-22	63
promonocyte	7.80e-22	63
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell	1.31e-18	71
classical monocyte	1.33e-18	45
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell	8.83e-17	70
myeloid leukocyte	1.35e-15	76
nongranular leukocyte	1.92e-12	119
leukocyte	2.95e-10	140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell	9.85e-10	124
myeloid cell	3.26e-07	112
common myeloid progenitor	3.26e-07	112

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	3.26e-18	115
bone element	1.57e-17	86
bone marrow	4.76e-17	80
skeletal element	6.58e-17	101
skeletal system	6.58e-17	101
neural tube	5.17e-15	57
neural rod	5.17e-15	57
future spinal cord	5.17e-15	57
neural keel	5.17e-15	57
hematopoietic system	4.14e-14	102
blood island	4.14e-14	102
anterior neural tube	2.92e-13	42
regional part of brain	7.71e-13	59
regional part of forebrain	1.04e-12	41
forebrain	1.04e-12	41
future forebrain	1.04e-12	41
central nervous system	1.36e-10	82
gray matter	2.02e-10	34
brain grey matter	2.02e-10	34
hemolymphoid system	2.22e-10	112
organ	3.39e-10	511
brain	3.91e-10	69
future brain	3.91e-10	69
telencephalon	7.70e-10	34
regional part of telencephalon	8.13e-10	33
cerebral hemisphere	3.01e-09	32
musculoskeletal system	4.33e-09	167
regional part of nervous system	6.10e-09	94
nervous system	6.10e-09	94
neural plate	1.08e-07	86
presumptive neural plate	1.08e-07	86
anterior region of body	3.12e-07	129
craniocervical region	3.12e-07	129
head	4.75e-07	123
cerebral cortex	5.95e-07	25
pallium	5.95e-07	25
regional part of cerebral cortex	7.07e-07	22

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CCNT2#905	4	6.33620157696263	0.000620310058721564	0.00513796194962499
CEBPB#1051	4	7.97114762582482	0.000247638578809083	0.00268791576930386
CTCF#10664	4	5.36025637307503	0.00121114538164362	0.00820197202136417
E2F1#1869	4	4.90738921487932	0.00172402235736179	0.0106819631573628
GATA1#2623	4	13.5603081438004	2.95627390049268e-05	0.000615285551800627
GATA2#2624	4	12.744931733554	3.78864877853583e-05	0.000724959123821004
GATA3#2625	4	27.236516357206	1.81561517799785e-06	6.79645281630527e-05
HEY1#23462	4	4.04011104310571	0.0037530463691798	0.0186667496785775
JUN#3725	4	12.5128291923363	4.07770316866756e-05	0.000745442396696081
JUND#3727	4	6.99466394187103	0.00041768421781858	0.00392712657766967
TAF1#6872	4	3.34304628574529	0.00800566489870165	0.032340681404692
TBP#6908	4	3.70677068709639	0.00529637781478435	0.024511383994251

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.