Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3725

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:40, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3725_CD14_CD4_CD8_Burkitt_CD19_Basophils_lymphoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:48405033..48405061,+p3@ME2
Hg19::chr4:110481348..110481368,+p2@CCDC109B
Hg19::chr4:110481374..110481458,+p1@CCDC109B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0016619malate dehydrogenase (oxaloacetate-decarboxylating) activity0.00129518426939833
GO:0004471malate dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) activity0.00129518426939833
GO:0004470malic enzyme activity0.00518005080645473
GO:0006108malate metabolic process0.00518005080645473
GO:0016615malate dehydrogenase activity0.00518005080645473
GO:0043648dicarboxylic acid metabolic process0.00690612438981643
GO:0006100tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediate metabolic process0.0118362817252174
GO:0051287NAD binding0.0232889542237499
GO:0016616oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor0.0393973010196954
GO:0016614oxidoreductase activity, acting on CH-OH group of donors0.0393973010196954
GO:0031980mitochondrial lumen0.0393973010196954
GO:0005759mitochondrial matrix0.0393973010196954



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
nongranular leukocyte2.94e-45119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.28e-41124
leukocyte7.79e-39140
hematopoietic stem cell2.95e-33172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.95e-33172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.13e-30165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.13e-30165
hematopoietic cell1.33e-29182
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte8.54e-2642
classical monocyte4.54e-2445
lymphocyte5.59e-2353
common lymphoid progenitor5.59e-2353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.49e-2252
monopoietic cell6.12e-2063
monocyte6.12e-2063
monoblast6.12e-2063
promonocyte6.12e-2063
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor9.44e-2065
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell7.18e-1971
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.53e-1970
myeloid leukocyte5.80e-1676
somatic stem cell3.98e-14436
multi fate stem cell4.24e-14430
stem cell1.24e-13444
mesenchymal cell6.41e-13358
lymphocyte of B lineage1.28e-1124
pro-B cell1.28e-1124
connective tissue cell1.65e-11365
native cell3.63e-11722
T cell6.45e-1125
pro-T cell6.45e-1125
myeloid cell9.57e-11112
common myeloid progenitor9.57e-11112
somatic cell1.77e-10591
mature alpha-beta T cell2.47e-1018
alpha-beta T cell2.47e-1018
immature T cell2.47e-1018
mature T cell2.47e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell2.47e-1018
motile cell2.52e-10390
B cell1.36e-0814
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell5.45e-0711
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system2.09e-26112
hematopoietic system2.11e-24102
blood island2.11e-24102
bone marrow1.44e-1880
lateral plate mesoderm5.17e-17216
bone element7.80e-1786
skeletal element1.58e-14101
skeletal system1.58e-14101
immune system2.94e-14115
connective tissue2.98e-11375
musculoskeletal system1.02e-09167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.