Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1224

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:34, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:126759057..126759082,+p8@Arhgap9
Mm9::chr11:106022022..106022035,-p11@Limd2
Mm9::chr4:120647785..120647794,-p@chr4:120647785..120647794
-
Mm9::chr4:120648011..120648037,-p6@Smap2
Mm9::chr4:120648047..120648070,-p5@Smap2
Mm9::chr4:120648071..120648079,-p8@Smap2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005096GTPase activator activity0.003266495597277
GO:0008047enzyme activator activity0.003266495597277
GO:0030695GTPase regulator activity0.0045733790285238
GO:0043087regulation of GTPase activity0.0471714856983727



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.60e-1512
mature alpha-beta T cell2.56e-149
alpha-beta T cell2.56e-149
immature T cell2.56e-149
mature T cell2.56e-149
immature alpha-beta T cell2.56e-149
lymphocyte8.73e-1413
common lymphoid progenitor8.73e-1413
T cell9.67e-1411
pro-T cell9.67e-1411
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.40e-128
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.96e-1225
hematopoietic cell2.24e-1132
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.24e-1132
hematopoietic stem cell2.24e-1132
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.24e-1132
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.24e-1132
nucleate cell1.11e-1016
leukocyte6.82e-1017
nongranular leukocyte6.82e-1017
thymocyte1.36e-096
double negative thymocyte1.36e-096
naive T cell1.36e-096
double-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte1.36e-096
CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte1.36e-096
naive thymus-derived CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.36e-096
DN4 thymocyte1.36e-096
DN1 thymic pro-T cell1.36e-096
DN2 thymocyte1.36e-096
DN3 thymocyte1.36e-096
immature single positive thymocyte1.36e-096
early T lineage precursor1.36e-096
mature CD4 single-positive thymocyte1.36e-096
resting double-positive thymocyte1.36e-096
double-positive blast1.36e-096
CD69-positive double-positive thymocyte1.36e-096
CD69-positive, CD4-positive single-positive thymocyte1.36e-096
CD4-positive, CD8-intermediate double-positive thymocyte1.36e-096
CD24-positive, CD4 single-positive thymocyte1.36e-096

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemopoietic organ1.90e-2829
immune organ1.90e-2829
thymus9.87e-2623
neck9.87e-2623
respiratory system epithelium9.87e-2623
hemolymphoid system gland9.87e-2623
pharyngeal epithelium9.87e-2623
thymic region9.87e-2623
pharyngeal gland9.87e-2623
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm9.87e-2623
thymus primordium9.87e-2623
early pharyngeal endoderm9.87e-2623
hemolymphoid system3.85e-2548
immune system3.85e-2548
pharynx2.08e-2424
gland of gut2.08e-2424
upper respiratory tract2.08e-2424
chordate pharynx2.08e-2424
pharyngeal arch system2.08e-2424
pharyngeal region of foregut2.08e-2424
hematopoietic system2.75e-2345
blood island2.75e-2345
respiratory tract1.57e-2241
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure2.44e-2235
respiratory system8.28e-2242
segment of respiratory tract4.99e-2127
organ segment1.64e-1635
craniocervical region2.62e-1436
foregut1.09e-1180
anterior region of body4.60e-1143
endo-epithelium2.31e-1069
lateral plate mesoderm6.51e-1087
gut epithelium1.72e-0755
digestive system7.88e-07116
digestive tract7.88e-07116
primitive gut7.88e-07116


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}