Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1071

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:40, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1071_renal_serous_Olfactory_clear_mesothelioma_Fibroblast_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:9049682..9049710,+p3@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049723..9049741,+p2@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049742..9049765,+p5@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049766..9049777,+p9@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9049782..9049807,+p6@PLCB4
Hg19::chr20:9077899..9077903,+p@chr20:9077899..9077903
+
Hg19::chr20:9079545..9079556,+p@chr20:9079545..9079556
+
Hg19::chr20:9172019..9172022,+p@chr20:9172019..9172022
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
skin fibroblast2.61e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.28e-16114
multi-tissue structure1.43e-13342
organ system subdivision1.43e-12223
ectoderm-derived structure3.66e-12171
ectoderm3.66e-12171
presumptive ectoderm3.66e-12171
anatomical cluster2.91e-11373
central nervous system1.59e-1081
nervous system2.77e-1089
organ3.66e-10503
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.16e-10132
neural tube1.12e-0956
neural rod1.12e-0956
future spinal cord1.12e-0956
neural keel1.12e-0956
organ part4.55e-09218
neural plate6.28e-0982
presumptive neural plate6.28e-0982
regional part of nervous system9.78e-0953
regional part of brain9.78e-0953
brain1.70e-0868
future brain1.70e-0868
neurectoderm2.59e-0886
cavitated compound organ3.73e-0831
ecto-epithelium3.94e-08104
multi-cellular organism9.91e-08656
kidney2.20e-0726
kidney mesenchyme2.20e-0726
upper urinary tract2.20e-0726
kidney rudiment2.20e-0726
kidney field2.20e-0726
anatomical system3.03e-07624
anatomical group3.86e-07625
digestive system4.49e-07145
digestive tract4.49e-07145
primitive gut4.49e-07145
surface structure4.99e-0799


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186953.067118259299580.01129732364974160.0414429639850847
FOXA1#316945.540709874692730.003444272925946160.0175232083063567
GATA3#2625310.21369363395230.002410870126189130.013590374324449
MYC#460953.263926169755880.008583639497943430.0327034410304142
NR3C1#290859.358139581983156.26414306316282e-050.00102494256207686



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.