Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C928

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:07, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C928_Retinal_Cardiac_mesothelioma_Renal_Meningeal_Smooth_Astrocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:12677510..12677525,-p3@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12677714..12677729,-p4@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12677781..12677800,-p2@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12678119..12678130,-p14@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12678194..12678203,-p13@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12678204..12678238,-p1@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12678241..12678252,-p11@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12678258..12678280,-p8@DHRS3
Hg19::chr1:12679956..12679993,-p@chr1:12679956..12679993
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical conduit8.53e-20241
epithelial tube1.79e-19118
epithelium3.34e-18309
unilaminar epithelium4.93e-18138
cell layer4.94e-18312
anatomical cluster5.18e-18286
multi-tissue structure1.74e-17347
organism subdivision8.26e-17365
trunk9.90e-17216
tube4.38e-16194
trunk mesenchyme6.41e-16143
muscle tissue9.04e-1463
musculature9.04e-1463
musculature of body9.04e-1463
skeletal muscle tissue1.94e-1361
striated muscle tissue1.94e-1361
myotome1.94e-1361
mesenchyme8.82e-13238
entire embryonic mesenchyme8.82e-13238
multi-cellular organism6.16e-12659
artery6.79e-1242
arterial blood vessel6.79e-1242
arterial system6.79e-1242
vasculature1.79e-1179
vascular system1.79e-1179
blood vessel2.00e-1160
epithelial tube open at both ends2.00e-1160
blood vasculature2.00e-1160
vascular cord2.00e-1160
vessel1.73e-1069
systemic artery3.38e-1033
systemic arterial system3.38e-1033
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.08e-1084
intermediate mesoderm1.27e-0937
anatomical system3.51e-09625
circulatory system3.71e-09113
dermomyotome5.08e-0970
anatomical group6.56e-09626
cardiovascular system8.31e-09110
immaterial anatomical entity1.44e-08126
compound organ3.79e-0869
multilaminar epithelium3.98e-0882
embryo5.75e-08612
subdivision of trunk6.05e-08113
embryonic structure1.84e-07605
developing anatomical structure1.84e-07605
pigment epithelium of eye2.43e-0711
germ layer3.10e-07604
embryonic tissue3.10e-07604
presumptive structure3.10e-07604
epiblast (generic)3.10e-07604
body cavity precursor4.60e-0763
duct6.12e-0726
abdominal segment of trunk9.81e-0761
abdomen9.81e-0761


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90553.520111987201460.007045560226413870.0293967985492565
CEBPB#105154.428415347680450.00252258685237060.0139876001207716
CHD2#110655.746679352287140.0007610423709220.00597657750031752
CTBP2#1488641.81133355955211.31796279068549e-091.1876334417291e-07
E2F6#187684.459693983731011.843503537119e-050.000419098097329498
EBF1#187954.948037136982780.001520003425085160.00968977828923088
GTF2B#2959724.845201060039.99944740019878e-109.2829536624832e-08
HEY1#2346262.693407362070470.009487643473762270.0357447421361516
HMGN3#932454.543637624083660.002244618319024410.012891866070204
MAX#414953.584753060559510.006502262485096670.0278441015080984
MXI1#460155.534206460421830.000906612702046980.00660244920082871
PBX3#5090512.17472927041342.1331797509613e-050.000470213507831675
POLR2A#543092.147453176558070.001029412892608020.00728788320845237
REST#597844.288901651612450.009457025945962830.0356679907829407
SIN3A#2594284.807897534946791.02597602607548e-050.000268013782359423
SMARCC1#6599733.96039058193561.13716814408286e-101.22564193807915e-08
TAF1#687282.971596698440260.0004233749951234810.00395960070884761
TBP#690883.294907277419010.0001918853220272470.00231572811962141
TCF7L2#693455.983431423965190.0006305154397321440.00518466278326001
TFAP2C#702244.804101604382320.006299303434747120.0277873353362711
YY1#752863.27411383323590.003375958902549820.0172428487785309
ZNF263#1012754.567689798339260.002191305809009130.0126336068113224



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.