Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4283

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:39, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4283_CD34_CD14_colon_adult_cord_acute_heart



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:130569415..130569428,+p12@ATP2C1
Hg19::chr3:130569429..130569479,+p4@ATP2C1
Hg19::chr3:130569482..130569507,+p11@ATP2C1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid cell5.61e-20108
common myeloid progenitor5.61e-20108
hematopoietic stem cell1.08e-15168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.08e-15168
hematopoietic cell1.48e-15177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.60e-15161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.60e-15161
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.43e-1467
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.77e-1366
myeloid leukocyte4.13e-1272
defensive cell8.99e-1248
phagocyte8.99e-1248
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.39e-1161
monopoietic cell2.68e-1059
monocyte2.68e-1059
monoblast2.68e-1059
promonocyte2.68e-1059
classical monocyte6.48e-1042
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte6.48e-1042
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.10e-09120
leukocyte1.56e-09136
stuff accumulating cell1.81e-0787
nongranular leukocyte6.19e-07115
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.67e-27114
hematopoietic system1.17e-1798
blood island1.17e-1798
hemolymphoid system2.13e-14108
bone marrow2.95e-1276
brain grey matter3.31e-1034
gray matter3.31e-1034
neural tube3.33e-1056
neural rod3.33e-1056
future spinal cord3.33e-1056
neural keel3.33e-1056
bone element4.08e-1082
skeletal element4.55e-1090
regional part of nervous system4.83e-1053
regional part of brain4.83e-1053
immune system6.55e-1093
telencephalon7.34e-1034
regional part of forebrain9.06e-1041
forebrain9.06e-1041
anterior neural tube9.06e-1041
future forebrain9.06e-1041
cerebral hemisphere1.44e-0932
regional part of telencephalon2.02e-0932
brain1.06e-0868
future brain1.06e-0868
regional part of cerebral cortex2.27e-0822
skeletal system6.39e-08100
central nervous system1.45e-0781
neocortex2.50e-0720


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538324.35780179230366.91705216281876e-050.00110089913263125
BCL11A#53335328.36945510360714.37778126761649e-050.000779027258150619
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00661898912213962
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00917533689976115
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167925117484051
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00388676704697878
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00437877458032551
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128435580909975
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00445230147929444
JUNB#3726330.61063265982113.4847716247536e-050.000681546935800827
MAFK#7975327.10073313782995.02195559325033e-050.000858549713870472
MEF2A#4205318.74323090964410.0001518243905622470.00195251662676154
MEF2C#4208341.31135449262411.41744912101957e-050.000340628091923983
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.027027352303441
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173351303479583
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.0088400977089318
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00769553755049011
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247233424130067
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109266463717118
STAT2#6773365.26377118644073.59360517547754e-060.000118507272157152
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00644198092044556
TAL1#6886329.86861667744023.75103522793067e-050.000720799205464307
TRIM28#10155318.59052504526250.0001555969297255280.00197549085139854



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.